wombynprivilege:

nedstarkshonour:

theresagooseinthemainframe:

nedstarkshonour:

Planned Parenthood put up an article about the clitoris and there are people commenting saying its “cissexist”. Get the hell out of here. Women have been shamed for their anatomy for sooo long and now that there is a safe space to talk about it freely, they’re being “cissexist.” Women literally cannot even talk about their bodies anymore without being oppressive in some way. Fuck that.

I’ve never understood on what grounds female organs are “cissexist” just for existing anyway. It could literally be a diagram of a clitoris with zero text, and someone would scream cissexism. Like. It exists. The clitoris exists in this universe and here is a diagram of it. It’s great. It’s female.
Im starting to think that when a person calls out “cissexism” they’re merely pointing out anything that isn’t male. That’s all.

Fuck off. Fuck off forever.

Our very female existence is transphobic to them because they want us to cater to their laydee dicks.

When I was a transactivist libfem, cissexism meant equating vagina with women and penis with men. now just the mention of these genitals without any mention of men or women is cissexism. what’s considered cissexist/transphobic is becoming broader and broader with time, erasing female anatomy and experiences entirely. I really hope this shit helps libfems wake up.

From what I’ve seen they think if you say female anatomy is female and male anatomy is male it is ‘cissexist‘. (Not a real word or concept). 

Transactivists and their allies misuse language and have clumsy reasoning skills. They often misuse the term equating when they mean associating. They get indignant when someone associating female anatomy with women and male anatomy with men. They don’t care what the context is, what your positions are or if you just stated a fact without drawing any conclusions from it. They just want to get indignant over their own misunderstanding of feminism and reality itself.   

Leave a comment