Friendly reminder
This is the ‘it takes two to tango‘ excuse for male violence.
Men can walk away and or block much easier than a woman can.
Next time don’t put this shit in the radfem tag.
Dude
You’re allowed to defend yourself, don’t condone female domestic violence that’s a fucked up double standard and is one of the reasons male abuse victims aren’t taken seriouslyA man can’t always “just walk away and or block much easier than a woman can”
Some women are tough as nails, and their male counterparts just aren’t
That’s okay, but violence is never okay unless you’re defending yourselfOh hey look at that, a feminist perpetuating the concept that men are stronger and less fragile than women.
Op: *equality*
@celtyradfem: “okay, but this could end up treating women like men get treated, so how about no.”
“All women are weak and defenseless so if you are being physically abused, you have to deal with it and not defend yourself because of you do, you’re an abusive misogynist.”
@chesireinthemiddle I don’t believe in equality. I believe in female liberation and I oppose male violence. Men are the ones being violent how about they fix their shit and stop it instead looking for excuses to bash women. What the op is advocating for doesn’t classify as self defense it is abuse and retaliation.
Men are on average stronger, have a much higher propensity for violence and recover quicker from injuries. Women are on average weaker and can easily die from what the op is suggesting. One punch can kill a woman.
Stop trying to justify male violence against women.
@cheshireinthemiddle I don’t know why this hopeless basketcase reblogged from me, but here you go, I’ll tag you.
@celtyradfem fucking prove it. Prove to me why women are oh so fragile. Prove to me how men are oh so violent. Just because you can embolden shit doesn’t mean you’re right. You make men sound like violent, uncontrollable roid monsters. What the fuck is you problem? That is NOT the case, if it were itd make my life so much easier.
Your view is so skewed and your claims so freaking infantile in their reasoning I’m surprised I’m even engaging you because obviously you’ll not listen to reason nor argue above a primary school level.
By the way I can make shit up too
Women are on average more powerful, have a much higher propensity for magic and recover quicker from mana loss. Men are on average weaker and can easily die from what the op is suggesting. One spell can kill a man.
I know the above is technically a strawman, but I just want to prove to you I can make shit up too. And yes, even if you there behind the computer screen were an asthmatic, polio-inflicted and in a wheelchair, the moment you start getting physically violent against me to hurt me is the moment I sure ass hell physically hurt you in self defense. Fuck your wellbeing if you’re harming mine. Just because I have a cock and you don’t is no justification for your violence nor any right to demonize my actions.
Stop making shit up that makes men sound like monsters, fuckn go outside for once, and leave me the fuck alone. I didn’t reblog from your ass; I didn’t invite you on my blog. Fuck off you stupid twat.
You make yourself look bad by saying things like this.
Men are far more violent than women. I don’t have ‘prove’ it because everybody already knows this. This is objective reality.
Take a quick look and violent crime statistics at you will see the difference between male and female criminality.
If you don’t believe me go around asking people in your life about men being violent vs women being violent.
And you’re making me look so good with what you’re saying lol
You argue like a 12 year old. Give me real UNBIASED facts. YOU have the burden of proof in this argument, not me. If you can’t provide me with objective, real, unbiased, scientific information from credible sources than your in essence admit your argument is invalid.
And you’re making me look so good with what you’re saying lol
You’re a legend in you own mind.
You argue like a 12 year old. Give me real UNBIASED facts.
I’m not the one using unnecessary capitals.
YOU
have the burden of proof in this argument, not me.Actually you do because you are arguing against facts that have already been pre-established. Men are far more violent and abusive than women are.
If you can’t provide
me with objective, real, unbiased, scientific information from credible
sources than your in essence admit your argument is invalid.I already sourced earlier in this post but here is the report I linked to again.
http://www.whiteribbon.org.au/uploads/media/Donna-Chungs-Research-Report.pdf
You say I use unnecessary capitals. Which is funny because I use them like when you embolden something in your original post. Don’t be an ass, that was weak.
You have the burden of proof because you chose to challenge the status quo of the post; ergo you have something to prove. It doesn’t matter if it’s “pre established facts” or not, your job is to provide evidence that this post is wrong and you are right. So far you haven’t and it’s pretty funny. Also it’s not pre established since most of society wouldn’t agree with you. That’s kinda one of the requirements for a socio-political topic to become established.
Providing a single link to a questionable source objective, real, unbiased, scientific information from credible sources (re: plural for a reason) does not make. Try again.
Cmon I know you can do better than that! I believe in you!
You say I use unnecessary capitals. Which
is funny because I use them like when you embolden something in your
original post. Don’t be an ass, that was weak.I don’t think you understand what formatting is.
You have the burden of proof because you chose to challenge the
status quo of the post; ergo you have something to prove.Actually the op has to prove the narrative.
It doesn’t
matter if it’s “pre established facts” or not,Yes it does. If you are arguing about a topic you can’t argue that the opposition has to prove something which is common knowledge.
Would you expect someone to prove gravity is real before talking about
your job is to provide
evidence that this post is wrong and you are right. So far you haven’t
and it’s pretty funny.I already have given you link to a report about male violence against women from a legitimate source. It’s not my fault you can’t be fucked to read it.
Also it’s not pre established since most of
society wouldn’t agree with you.Proof?
That’s kinda one of the requirements
for a socio-political topic to become established.There are decades of research about male aggression and violence against women. It is already pre-established.
Providing a single link to a questionable source objective, real,
unbiased, scientific information from credible sources (re: plural for a
reason) does not make. Try again.I linked you a report about male violence which is backed the Australia Government. Your job is to read through it.
Cmon I know you can do better than that! I believe in you!
I can give you all the links in the world but if you don’t read them then you will remain ignorant of the reality of men’s violence against women.
I do understand what it is. Which is why I did it via capitalization. Soooo wtf are you saying? Do *you* know what formatting is?
Ok I can boil the next two down to “no”. Op doesn’t have to prove anything. You made the assertion. You defend it. Simple. And there’s absolutely nothing that says men are biologically more violent than women. What world/country do you live in? I have officially lived in 2 and I can conclude through my experiences women are just as violent. But I, like yourself, am not a professional so my observations are pretty worthless, admittedly.
Thank you for the one (1) source. Wow. So helpful. Much info.
You have the absolute fucking gall to ask me for proof when you refuse to support your argument when I’ve asked you multiple times to. Fuck you.
On a personal note anything that comes from any gov is questionable. The next source you’ll give me will probably be from Russia, and believe you me I know way more than you not to trust that as a credible source. But I go back to saying that you gave me but one (1) source. Congrats that proves nothing.
You’ve officially bored me. I haven’t seen any proof for your argument. You say that I’m biologically some violent monster. Im not and personally that offends me, but that’s beside the point. And you’re right, I’m not as smart as I think I am. But most obviously so are you.
I’m tired. Let’s just agree the other is wrong and let’s stop this stupid pointless slapfight. It’s not going anywhere; I’m not going to convince you of anything and you’re not going to convince me of anything, especially due to the lack of reading material. Please let’s stop.
I have officially lived in 2 and I can conclude through my experiences women are just as violent.
To quote you “By the way I can make shit up“.
You have the absolute fucking gall to ask me for proof when you refuse
to support your argument when I’ve asked you multiple times to. Fuck
you.
I did support my argument. You weren’t reasonable about it so I can’t actually communicate anything to you.
You say that I’m biologically some violent monster.
Well I actually said men are far more violent than women and male violence against women. Which is true and everybody knows this.
You took this way too personally.
Stop taking everything so personally
It isn’t rational
Thank you for the one (1) source. Wow. So helpful. Much info.
There was a lot of info on that report.
I didn’t expect you to bother to read it let alone contextualise it tbh.
I’m tired. Let’s just agree the other is wrong and let’s stop this stupid pointless slapfight.
Your language is giving you away.
Celtyradfem 