Transwomen (MtT) and crossdressing males have a record of raping and molesting women and children. There are no known recorded cases of cis women or labelled “terfs” raping and molesting transgender people.
Transwomen (MtT) and crossdressing males have a record of other violent attacks and homicide against women, men, and children. Cis men, but not women, have no record of violent attacks and homicide against transwomen or male crossdressers:
Transwomen (MtT) and crossdressing males have a record of intimidating others by exposing their genitals to them and masturbating in public places. Cis women or those labelled “terfs” have no record of intimidating transgender people by exposing their genitals to them and masturbating in public places.
Transwomen (MtT) and crossdressing males spy and record women and girls in restrooms and locker-rooms. No known record exists of cis women or those labelled as “terfs” spying or recording transwomen in restrooms or locker-rooms.
Transwomen (MtT) and crossdressing men attempt to ban feminist and lesbian books. No known record of “terfs” attempting to organize and ban transwomen books or speeches :
Each episode comes with dual audio, which means you can watch it in both English or Japanese. All of them were re-encoded and originally uploaded by SkyLord. Each episode is around 98 MB, but they’re still good quality. If a link doesn’t work for you, please let me know. Enjoy!
ok hopefully this will finally push me into finishing this series
Each episode comes with dual audio, which means you can watch it in both English or Japanese. All of them were re-encoded and originally uploaded by SkyLord. Each episode is around 98 MB, but they’re still good quality. If a link doesn’t work for you, please let me know. Enjoy!
ok hopefully this will finally push me into finishing this series
I’m all for fighting for marriage equality in the LGBT community. But we’re so focused on that no one knows about this problem.
W…wait Thats a thing????
Yep! The man I refer to as my husband? We aren’t actually married. We can’t be.
If I married him, the government would literally expect me to care for him and be his sole source of income. He would lose all of his benefits, including SSDI. Spouses are expected to share income and that effects ALL of his benefits, even his health insurance. We simply can’t afford to be married.
But it goes even further than that. If I were disabled, our incomes would STILL be combined, meaning BOTH of us would have our benefits cut.
For people reviving supplemental income, their benefits can be cut anywhere from 25% of their current income all the way down to 0%
In fact, one of the stipulations of receiving income under the adult disabled child program (which provides benefits for people who were disabled before age 22) is that they LITERALLY never be married.
I normally don’t link to blog posts as resources, but since social service resource sites like to dress this problem up and make it seem smaller than it really is, I’m gonna call it appropriate! Check it out!
I’m upset about the situation in case you couldn’t tell.
THIS AFFECTS MILLIONS YOOO
Yep! Yall have probably heard that people receiving disability benefits can’t have more than $2000 in assets at any time? (If you haven’t, now you know – people receiving disability benefits are not allowed to save money. They foster dependence and then cut your benefits at every turn.) If you’re married, your spouses income and assets count as your own. You technically could get married, but now your spouse can’t save any money, either. No emergency savings, no retirement, nothing.
If this seems like an egregious oversight in the law, I applaud your optimism. This is deliberate. Among other things, it functions as a way to implement a modern-day eugenics program. The point is to discourage disabled people from having children. Of course, not all married people have children, and not all people who have children get married, but governments know that there’s a strong relationship between marriage and children. That’s why they incentivize marriage so much, with tax breaks and stuff. Governments want people to have children. Healthy people, that is. But if you literally can’t marry your co-parent, and you can’t save any money for the expenses of having children, that’s a strong deterrent against having children.
I’m all for fighting for marriage equality in the LGBT community. But we’re so focused on that no one knows about this problem.
W…wait Thats a thing????
Yep! The man I refer to as my husband? We aren’t actually married. We can’t be.
If I married him, the government would literally expect me to care for him and be his sole source of income. He would lose all of his benefits, including SSDI. Spouses are expected to share income and that effects ALL of his benefits, even his health insurance. We simply can’t afford to be married.
But it goes even further than that. If I were disabled, our incomes would STILL be combined, meaning BOTH of us would have our benefits cut.
For people reviving supplemental income, their benefits can be cut anywhere from 25% of their current income all the way down to 0%
In fact, one of the stipulations of receiving income under the adult disabled child program (which provides benefits for people who were disabled before age 22) is that they LITERALLY never be married.
I normally don’t link to blog posts as resources, but since social service resource sites like to dress this problem up and make it seem smaller than it really is, I’m gonna call it appropriate! Check it out!
I’m upset about the situation in case you couldn’t tell.
THIS AFFECTS MILLIONS YOOO
Yep! Yall have probably heard that people receiving disability benefits can’t have more than $2000 in assets at any time? (If you haven’t, now you know – people receiving disability benefits are not allowed to save money. They foster dependence and then cut your benefits at every turn.) If you’re married, your spouses income and assets count as your own. You technically could get married, but now your spouse can’t save any money, either. No emergency savings, no retirement, nothing.
If this seems like an egregious oversight in the law, I applaud your optimism. This is deliberate. Among other things, it functions as a way to implement a modern-day eugenics program. The point is to discourage disabled people from having children. Of course, not all married people have children, and not all people who have children get married, but governments know that there’s a strong relationship between marriage and children. That’s why they incentivize marriage so much, with tax breaks and stuff. Governments want people to have children. Healthy people, that is. But if you literally can’t marry your co-parent, and you can’t save any money for the expenses of having children, that’s a strong deterrent against having children.
“The justice system eventually would work well in this case in several respects. The victim was rescued and provided with treatment. The traffickers who exploited her were caught, pleaded guilty and were sent to prison.
But what of the men who paid to rape this child? What consequences did they suffer?
Not a single one was ever charged.
That same breach of justice is the norm in thousands of trafficking cases. About 10,000 children a year suffer the horrors of commercial sexual exploitation in the United States. Each victim on average is forced to have sex more than five times a day.
Yet the buyers who fuel the child sex trade are seldom held accountable. Most just blend back into their families, jobs and neighborhoods. Until the next time.
…
This project began with a question: Who buys a 15-year-old child for sex?
The answer: Many otherwise ordinary men. They could be your co-worker, doctor, pastor or spouse.
“They’re in all walks of life,” a 17-year-old survivor from the Midwest, trafficked when she was 15, said about the more than 150 men who purchased her in a month. “Some could be upstanding people in the community. It was mostly people in their 40s, living in the suburbs, who were coming to get the stuff they were missing.”
The scale of the trade indicates that it’s not a small number of men who pay to have sex with kids. A 2016 study by the Center for Court Innovation found that between 8,900 and 10,500 children, ages 13 to 17, are commercially exploited each year in this country. Several hundred children 12 and younger, a group not included in the study, also suffer commercial sexual abuse.
The researchers found that the average age of victims is 15 and that each child is purchased on average 5.4 times a day. I’ve interviewed victims who were forced to have sex with more than 30 men in a week; more than 100 in a month.
To determine a conservative estimate of the demand, I multiplied the lower number of victims (8,900) identified in the Center for Court Innovation study by the rate of daily exploitation per child (5.4), and then by an average of only one “work” day per week (52). The result: Adults purchase children for sex at least 2.5 million times a year in the United States.
The number of identified victims in the U.S. is on the rise. The National Human Trafficking Hotline recorded a 35 percent increase in reports in 2016. Most of the cases involved sex trafficking and many of the victims were children.
…
And it’s rare for police and prosecutors to pursue buyers after they’ve paid to abuse children. That’s true even in the most nauseating of crimes.
In 2016, police rescued a 12-year-old Texas girl who was held captive in a hotel room in a wealthy suburb of Nashville, Tenn. Authorities said the child, found with bruises and scratches on her face, had been advertised on Backpage.com and sold to sex buyers for a month in the Knoxville, Memphis and Nashville areas.
A 36-year-old Nashville man, Tavarie Williams, was charged with multiple counts of trafficking, kidnapping and rape. He is awaiting trial. But, as in the case of the 15-year-old from Illinois, none of the men who paid to sexually abuse a middle school-age child were ever charged. (A spokeswoman for the Davidson County (Tenn.) District Attorney’s Office said authorities were unable to identify any of the buyers, who could have faced felony charges).
“That child will have to fight the stigma of what happened to her for the rest of her life,” said Alex Trouteaud, director of policy and research with Demand Abolition, a Massachusetts-based organization that works to reduce demand for commercial sex. “Meanwhile, the buyers will never be held accountable. It’s what we call the culture of impunity.”
…
Survivors I interviewed reported similar experiences. One of them, exploited when she was 15, said only two men turned and left the motel room when they saw how young she was. Even those two didn’t notify police about the ongoing abuse of a child.
More than 100 other men who paid to have sex with her stayed. “They just didn’t care” about her age, she said.
In a room full of sex buyers, enrolled in a court-ordered program in Seattle, I asked: “Do you ever think about the life stories of the girls and women you purchased?”
The men appeared uncertain about how to answer. Then a former once-a-week buyer, arrested for attempting to purchase sex from a police officer posing as a 15-year-old girl, said, “I don’t want to know how the sausage is made.”
A piece of meat. A commodity to be consumed.
Not a child. Not a life.”
In my own personal experience, I have been bought by so many men that they all start to blend together. Considering that I was 10 when I was first trafficked and that I have been raped roughly 1,500 times, it’s not hard to understand that all of the men sort of form into one looming monster. There are a few men I remember distinctly though, and one of them was the janitor at my middle school. He was old, probably 60, and he’d smile at me in the halls the days after he raped me (if I was in school, that is). He knew he was untouchable. They all know that.
Celtyradfem 