Sad to see redkatherinee deactivating her Tumblr bc of being sent hate and TRA’s detailed murder fantasies. Leaving Tumblr is def a healthy decision. Hope she’s doing alright 💕
Sad to see redkatherinee deactivating her Tumblr bc of being sent hate and TRA’s detailed murder fantasies. Leaving Tumblr is def a healthy decision. Hope she’s doing alright 💕
Found these lesbian skeletons at work today. Reblog to be blessed by the lesbian skeletons
Lesbian skele- You absolute minge of a CaC. Two females does not automatically mean lesbian. Furthermore Skeletons have no organs or genetalia. Skeletons are sexless. And they are hella spooky. 2spooky in fact. Quit your labeling bullshit.
Women and men have different skeletons.
Archeologists can determine the sex of the remains by looking at the skeleton.
Found these lesbian skeletons at work today. Reblog to be blessed by the lesbian skeletons
Lesbian skele- You absolute minge of a CaC. Two females does not automatically mean lesbian. Furthermore Skeletons have no organs or genetalia. Skeletons are sexless. And they are hella spooky. 2spooky in fact. Quit your labeling bullshit.
Women and men have different skeletons.
Archeologists can determine the sex of the remains by looking at the skeleton.
Exactly, I’m pretty sure “I don’t want any interaction” is pretty darn clear and doesn’t really need to be explained but whatever I guess
You fuckwits call us ‘terfs’ and ‘genital fetishes’ for having boundaries so I don’t see what you are complaining about
Holy fucking shit this wasn’t even about you asswipes why the fuck are you here? Do you really think it’s suddenly okay to ignore a mentally ill person’s boundaries that they have to protect their mental health just because they don’t agree with your transphobia? Wtf get out of here.
I don’t care who you date or if you’re penis-repulsed or not, you don’t have to be a transphobe about it. I call you a terf because you’re a transphobe, not because you don’t want to date someone who you aren’t attracted to.
Go to the doctor, that reach had to have hurt.
We know you were talking about us.
“that they have to protect their mental health”
You have to your mental health from women who don’t believe in transgenderism?
“just because they don’t agree with your transphobia?”
“Transphobia” isn’t a real thing.
“I don’t care who you date or if you’re penis-repulsed or not, you don’t have to be a transphobe about it.”
Then you do care. Lesbians telling trans males they don’t want to date them and are disgusted by dick isn’t transphobic".
“I call you a terf because you’re a transphobe, not because you don’t want to date someone who you aren’t attracted to.”
Wow people who are antis and radfems sure can’t read or prove their side. More at 12.
lmfao pornsick pedo freak can’t actually comprehend written information! a chart with “top searches” written on it do not actually indicate anything other than which gender searches for what, you fucking obtuse twat. Lmfao you’re actually embarassing yourself. More at 11.
Well with you using ad hominem attacks on me instead of presenting a cohesive argument is kinda showing everyone that I’m not wrong.
I used the chart as a “quickie”. Literally one argument you radfems constantly propose about porn is that men fetishize you through lesbian porn yet in the graphic I presented to you women viewed more lesbian porn than men.
Whenever someone gives you information or an idea contrary to your close minded ramblings you are quick to dismiss it and attack the person because in your mind you don’t have to prove something.
Even then you have yet to prove that I am wrong. Even in your attacks on my character are inaccurate and unjust. I haven’t been convicted of any crime especially child molestation, which you know would make one a pedophile. I have been molested as a child.
You must know you have no grounds as you’re simply attacking one to attack one but I will do this.
– Officialfemmefish a female map expressed the desire to molest young girls.
– Lesbiananti
– The fact that most maps on this site are female/“afab”/trans male which in your eyes means woman when it doesn’t.
– I’m embarrassing myself when you’re a grown ass woman coming for a teenager. Bitch you need a life.
Also you’re on Tumblr, that alone should tell you that you and your ideologies are subpar and that you are an embarrassment for being an extremist and having your head so far up your coochie and can’t smell your coochie blood anymore.
You’ve now twice incorrectly interpreted statistics to imply that women watch more porn overall than men when in fact the relevant comparison is relative. In your original post, you presented an infographic that compares search terms by gender not quantitatively but proportionally – the infographic shows us that women’s most-searched term is “lesbian” and men’s most-searched is “teen,” but does not give us any concrete information about how many times any of these terms have been searched (or how many separate users have searched them, or how much cumulative or individual time has been spent browsing results…and so forth). Your list of articles and the conclusions you make from them are likewise highly erroneous and very misleading. Let’s break down the faulty logic in your implications that these articles show, or at the very least argue, that women watch more porn than men in some sense (when two of the three emphatically do not, and the last one is badly titled for its actual thesis):
1. The Daily Mail article actually has an incorrect (or highly misleading) title, but regardless even its headline does not state that more women watch porn on PornHub than men. It reports that more women watch PornHub on mobile devices than men. The statistic to which the headline refers compares relative traffic between men and women on certain devices and concludes that women are vastly more likely to visit the website from a smartphone, but says absolutely nothing about quantitative numbers of visits, time spent, or users registered on all devices universally (or even, in fact, on smartphones). The site is in fact discussing the rate at which women prefer to visit the site via mobile versus desktop instances and compares this to the same rate for men. This means that a million men could be visiting the site on mobile and only a thousand women over the period during which the study was conducted, and the findings of the article would still be correct, because it speaks only in terms of fractional quantities out of the total gendered viewership of PornHub that each gender, separately considered, spends on mobile devices. Ultimately, the article notes that vastly more men visit PornHub overall than women – see the screenshot above.
2. The Glamour article gets its statistics from this study, which discovered that, of a sampling of 100 married heterosexual couples, roughly 9% of female participants and 23% of male participants reported having watched porn before marriage, while 28% of female participants and 14% of male participants reported watching it after. Disregarding the distressingly small sample sizes, as well as the fact that “watching porn” is not a well-defined term here (how regularly? A few or many times? For how long each time?), one must consider the fact that spousal influence – wherein wives prefer their husbands not to watch porn, while many husbands may ask their wives to watch porn with them as a form of intimate bonding and sexual foreplay – must play an impact which has not been fully accounted for here. Even discounting these concerns, however, and taking the study’s findings as discussed in the article at face value, the study actually says nothing concretely about how much time women or men spend watching porn before or after marriage: if both sexes spend much less time watching porn after marriage overall (and there is some reason to believe this), the relative proportions each gender spends on porn after marriage mean nothing. I am highly skeptical of this study, in any case, since a 100-unit sample size is egregiously small: if even half a dozen outliers are included by chance, the resulting discoveries could easily contain an error of 6% or more.
3. The HelloGiggles article compares the amount of time spent per visit by the average female PornHub user compared to the average male user. It says nothing on how frequently female users versus male users make visits to the site in a given amount of time, nor how many female versus male users exist on the site – nor even how the raw data gathered by PornHub data collector programs (which are mindless units of code operating on the website, not actual people) distinguish between female and male users. The headline is misleading.
You have no concrete evidence that most pedophiles on this site are female. Please either commit to conducting a study on users of this site who have been reported as, or admit to being, pedophiles or molesters (and interpret your results more correctly than you’ve interpreted the studies you’ve already cited), or don’t act as if your opinions, based off your personal and anecdotal experiences, are facts. I could just as easily claim that the vast majority of users on this site who are pedophiles have been, in my encounters, male, making your statement incorrect.
I’m sure that women and lesbians exist who are pedophiles. Pedophiles exist among all peoples. Reciting the names of one or two you believe to be pedophiles is completely irrelevant.
Last but not least, your most embarrassing ad-hominem statements at the end of your post toward @phalloid-destroyer are quite incriminating. I’m not surprised, but disappointed, to see you behaving that way. It undermines any credibility your earlier attempt at citations and a structured argument might have granted you. In the future, do try not to be such a hypocrite. After all, since you’re on Tumblr too (and far more invested in this entire argument than PD ever was), I suppose what you said about her must apply to you as well. c:
Celtyradfem 