Bonus: his trans/furry friends think terfs and nazi furries got him fired, not telling a famous, esteemed NASA engineer to suck his dick and balls.
“a young trans woman in need” the FUCK this person GOT HIMSELF FIRED for sexually harassing a stranger, and you want to say he’s “in need”? l o l
They make him sound like a damsel in distress not some arrogant asshole who told his future boss to suck his dick
Why would TERFs spam NASA to get at this one trans women who we didn’t even know existed before seeing these screenshots lmao. Paranoid much?
Hickam didn’t even get the guy fired or ask for him to be fired. He got fired because he literally hashtagged it #nasa and, uh, nasa saw it and fired him.
God these dudes are so obsessed with making themselves out to be a victim in every fucking situation.
Fucking juvenile. This is such male behavior. Btw if a real woman said anything remotely similar, no one would be working to make sure she gets her job back. That’s straight up trans privilege.
Ah, i love seeing angry terfs try to justify their shitty lives by shittng on trans people. How about you call her what she actually is? She is a real woman.
*looks at your url*
You are automatically invalid
Did he create an account just to bicker on this particular post? He has three posts and they are all telling people in this thread that the poor furry is a woman.
Bonus: his trans/furry friends think terfs and nazi furries got him fired, not telling a famous, esteemed NASA engineer to suck his dick and balls.
“a young trans woman in need” the FUCK this person GOT HIMSELF FIRED for sexually harassing a stranger, and you want to say he’s “in need”? l o l
They make him sound like a damsel in distress not some arrogant asshole who told his future boss to suck his dick
Why would TERFs spam NASA to get at this one trans women who we didn’t even know existed before seeing these screenshots lmao. Paranoid much?
Hickam didn’t even get the guy fired or ask for him to be fired. He got fired because he literally hashtagged it #nasa and, uh, nasa saw it and fired him.
God these dudes are so obsessed with making themselves out to be a victim in every fucking situation.
Fucking juvenile. This is such male behavior. Btw if a real woman said anything remotely similar, no one would be working to make sure she gets her job back. That’s straight up trans privilege.
Ah, i love seeing angry terfs try to justify their shitty lives by shittng on trans people. How about you call her what she actually is? She is a real woman.
*looks at your url*
You are automatically invalid
Did he create an account just to bicker on this particular post? He has three posts and they are all telling people in this thread that the poor furry is a woman.
hey! thanks for your addition, it’s something that really needed to be added and I thank you for that. Correct me if I’m wrong though, but wasn’t Adrienne Rich trans-exclusionary? That would be the only thing that’s making me uncomfortable about your addition and I would take her stuff with a grain of salt tbh.
D: GOD I had absolutely no idea I just took the picture that said “compulsory heterosexuality” in full letters with the best quality page one of google image could offer
I checked and you’re right, sorry for the mistake! Here’s an updated version
hey! thanks for your addition, it’s something that really needed to be added and I thank you for that. Correct me if I’m wrong though, but wasn’t Adrienne Rich trans-exclusionary? That would be the only thing that’s making me uncomfortable about your addition and I would take her stuff with a grain of salt tbh.
D: GOD I had absolutely no idea I just took the picture that said “compulsory heterosexuality” in full letters with the best quality page one of google image could offer
I checked and you’re right, sorry for the mistake! Here’s an updated version
I know Adrienne Rich is a gross TERF to avoid. However, one of my professors has assigned Rich’s piece “Claiming an Education” as a reading for the course. I’m wondering if any of you know of a reading that similar in topic/ideas that is not written by a TERF, so I can suggest it to my professor to use as a replacement reading for the future.
(obviously, terfs do not interact)
Just read it. You’ll live.
Try not to burn it
We know what trans activists do to ideas they don’t agree with
Don’t read it and fail the course! ^.^
Or stop being so fucking immature! Maybe university is not the place for you, if you can’t handle reading works by people you don’t agree with.
I often read things from people I don’t agree with (not just comments) and watch videos of people I don’t agree with.
It is wise to understand what your opponents believe in. It strengthens your arguments and broadens your horizons.
I know Adrienne Rich is a gross TERF to avoid. However, one of my professors has assigned Rich’s piece “Claiming an Education” as a reading for the course. I’m wondering if any of you know of a reading that similar in topic/ideas that is not written by a TERF, so I can suggest it to my professor to use as a replacement reading for the future.
(obviously, terfs do not interact)
Just read it. You’ll live.
Try not to burn it
We know what trans activists do to ideas they don’t agree with
Don’t read it and fail the course! ^.^
Or stop being so fucking immature! Maybe university is not the place for you, if you can’t handle reading works by people you don’t agree with.
I often read things from people I don’t agree with (not just comments) and watch videos of people I don’t agree with.
It is wise to understand what your opponents believe in. It strengthens your arguments and broadens your horizons.
I’m a pretty radical feminist, but you know what’s not radical?
*kick flips*
excluding POC, disabled, trans, or basically anyone from your feminism. So remember! Feminists are rad! But radfems? Not so much!
*whips out a pair of sunglasses and skates away*
Wow this is embarrassing for you. The only group of people we exclude are males. Not POC, disabled people, trans or otherwise. Time to get some new arguments buddy
Males are excluded from radical feminism and you male supremacists cannot fucking stand it.
They like the sound of the title radical feminism but they don’t like actual radfems
… Um… That’s not what radical means in the context of radical feminism….
I’m a pretty radical feminist, but you know what’s not radical?
*kick flips*
excluding POC, disabled, trans, or basically anyone from your feminism. So remember! Feminists are rad! But radfems? Not so much!
*whips out a pair of sunglasses and skates away*
Wow this is embarrassing for you. The only group of people we exclude are males. Not POC, disabled people, trans or otherwise. Time to get some new arguments buddy
Males are excluded from radical feminism and you male supremacists cannot fucking stand it.
They like the sound of the title radical feminism but they don’t like actual radfems
… Um… That’s not what radical means in the context of radical feminism….