menphobic:

menphobic:

why is it that female normie tumblr is just like, tweet screenshots n animals n disney memes n makeup while male normie tumblr is tweet screenshots and extremely violent porn

god so many people from the darksided part of radfem tumblr are following me from this post

This looks like a radfem post

thebeeskidneys:

feeling very grateful for all that the women in previous feminist waves have done to make my life safer and more survivable and so so sad & sorry that today’s mainstream feminist movement is so ready to let them go- their art, their work, their goals. older women: I love u. thanks

thebeeskidneys:

feeling very grateful for all that the women in previous feminist waves have done to make my life safer and more survivable and so so sad & sorry that today’s mainstream feminist movement is so ready to let them go- their art, their work, their goals. older women: I love u. thanks

akuma-no-joo:

If you have a thinspo blog block the limp dick who calles himself @anasdaddy

His bio really says it all where he implies that he’s here to not just be a “Ana coach” but also to be a “dom” so he’s literally grooming people with eating disorders to be his sex toys.

This is only supported further by “the solution [to not sticking to a diet] is to submit to your master and surrender the control of calorie counting to him”

This limp dick literally thinks eating disorders are diets, that you can just “hand over” control of your eating disorder (even tho most of us can’t even control it outselves since shocker it’s a fucking disorder!) and thinks that people with eating disorders are easy sex toys.

I’ve heard he’s been known to send messages offering to be someone Ana coach which is extremely worrying to me because he reblogs from lots of minors. It also worries me becuase he’s in to DDLG (not saying the kink itself is necessary pedophileic) but this dude is obvi into little girls he can easily control. Block and report this dude he’s been using our blogs and photos for porn for far too long and since he won’t stop we need to stop him.

dd/lg is inherently a pedophiliac kink.

Stop defending kinks.

They are not worth defending.

akuma-no-joo:

If you have a thinspo blog block the limp dick who calles himself @anasdaddy

His bio really says it all where he implies that he’s here to not just be a “Ana coach” but also to be a “dom” so he’s literally grooming people with eating disorders to be his sex toys.

This is only supported further by “the solution [to not sticking to a diet] is to submit to your master and surrender the control of calorie counting to him”

This limp dick literally thinks eating disorders are diets, that you can just “hand over” control of your eating disorder (even tho most of us can’t even control it outselves since shocker it’s a fucking disorder!) and thinks that people with eating disorders are easy sex toys.

I’ve heard he’s been known to send messages offering to be someone Ana coach which is extremely worrying to me because he reblogs from lots of minors. It also worries me becuase he’s in to DDLG (not saying the kink itself is necessary pedophileic) but this dude is obvi into little girls he can easily control. Block and report this dude he’s been using our blogs and photos for porn for far too long and since he won’t stop we need to stop him.

dd/lg is inherently a pedophiliac kink.

Stop defending kinks.

They are not worth defending.

Still don’t get the term TERF

thentheysaidburnher:

noanodyne:

female-only:

tehbewilderness:

never-obey:

It doesn’t make any sense at all.

image

What does that acronym stand for? Does anyone know? Google doesn’t.

Hi, Teh. It means: “Trans-Exclusive Radical Feminist”

It means, “Get back in your place, wenches, the Master has spoken.”

This is how long I’ve been on tumblr.

I just scrolled back to like 2013. Remember when we had to make asks rebloggable by screenshotting them? Those were trying days.

I remember when they called us “radscum”

Still don’t get the term TERF

thentheysaidburnher:

noanodyne:

female-only:

tehbewilderness:

never-obey:

It doesn’t make any sense at all.

image

What does that acronym stand for? Does anyone know? Google doesn’t.

Hi, Teh. It means: “Trans-Exclusive Radical Feminist”

It means, “Get back in your place, wenches, the Master has spoken.”

This is how long I’ve been on tumblr.

I just scrolled back to like 2013. Remember when we had to make asks rebloggable by screenshotting them? Those were trying days.

I remember when they called us “radscum”

radbian:

drakenotingale:

radbian:

drakenotingale:

radbian:

drakenotingale:

radbian:

drakenotingale:

radbian:

asprodente:

radbian:

sighinastorm:

liberalsdontinteract:

whenever you think you’ve seen and heard it all, another man comes along and one-ups the one before him, this is why we’re telling you all to stop dating men

I thought you were doing important stuff.  I thought you were more than just a man-hater.

Man tried to kill wife and child after abusing them

Men: that aside, how dare you question men

Radfems: The actions of any individual man reflects on all men, despite it being committed by a small minority of men. This is not prejudiced, somehow.

A man among the vast majority who are exceptions in not doing the thing men in general are being criticized for: Hey that’s prejudiced and I don’t like it.

Radfems: How dare you.

A man tried to kill his family and you want to talk about “not all men”. No empathy or care. Your only thoughts are about yourself. It’s disgusting.

80% of arrests for violent crimes are men.

And 80% of abuse towards men goes unreported with a majority of that being….*gasp* women.

If you notice, no one made a big deal out of it being men until the radfems came along and painted the entire sex as incarnate evil. Like you.

It IS a big deal. Male violence is a problem. Don’t make up ridiculous statistics we both know isn’t true.

In the context of the article, where you imply is some sort of concept of masculinity perpetuating the abuse or attempted manslaughter, that is where the inaccuracy is. The article specifies one single instance where a psychopath flew his plane into his house to kill not just his wife but his child as well.

Sorry love, that’s not masculine anything. That’s called psychopathy.

An article talking about one case specified one case? No shit. We can still see a pattern.

We have thousands of articles of one instance where a man tries to kill his wife or gf and does or does not succeed but they are all each just individual cases nothing to see here.

Each earthquake is its own individual earthquake. It has no meaning or pattern. Life’s just crazy uwu

“thousands of articles”

Okay so who is making up fake statistics now?

Let’s consider some facts:

2 million articles get posted daily

2.5 women are killed by male partners each day

Not all murders are talked about in the news

Some murders are talked about extensively by every media outlet

Let’s just say 1/10 of domestic violence victims are talked about in the news, each one time, that would mean 91.25 articles are published each year. Over a ten year period that would be almost one thousand. Since we know some cases get dozens of stories themselves and that there are hundreds of media outlets that all cover similar stories that figure goes up extensively. It’s not even a question of there being thousands.

>mentions statistics of abuse factoring in male victims, majority of which are unreported and many of which are female abusers

>”wow don’t make up statistics that’s not true at all”

>says thousands of articles exist, doesn’t prove this data is factual

>”its okay tho because they don’t get published or talked about!”

No shit abuse happens. We know it happens. That doesn’t validate the concept that all of one sex are incarnate evil, nor does it invalidate that the ones who do these acts of violence are fucked up in the head.

These cases you bring up? Individual male assailants. All unrelated to one another. No connection. No proxy. Nothing. Their acts are pursued by free will and the drive to harm others alone. That isn’t toxic masculinity or whatever the fuck you’re trying to call it. That’s a psychopath out to harm others. Point blank period.

@drakenotingale violence against women is the background noise of society

radbian:

drakenotingale:

radbian:

drakenotingale:

radbian:

drakenotingale:

radbian:

drakenotingale:

radbian:

asprodente:

radbian:

sighinastorm:

liberalsdontinteract:

whenever you think you’ve seen and heard it all, another man comes along and one-ups the one before him, this is why we’re telling you all to stop dating men

I thought you were doing important stuff.  I thought you were more than just a man-hater.

Man tried to kill wife and child after abusing them

Men: that aside, how dare you question men

Radfems: The actions of any individual man reflects on all men, despite it being committed by a small minority of men. This is not prejudiced, somehow.

A man among the vast majority who are exceptions in not doing the thing men in general are being criticized for: Hey that’s prejudiced and I don’t like it.

Radfems: How dare you.

A man tried to kill his family and you want to talk about “not all men”. No empathy or care. Your only thoughts are about yourself. It’s disgusting.

80% of arrests for violent crimes are men.

And 80% of abuse towards men goes unreported with a majority of that being….*gasp* women.

If you notice, no one made a big deal out of it being men until the radfems came along and painted the entire sex as incarnate evil. Like you.

It IS a big deal. Male violence is a problem. Don’t make up ridiculous statistics we both know isn’t true.

In the context of the article, where you imply is some sort of concept of masculinity perpetuating the abuse or attempted manslaughter, that is where the inaccuracy is. The article specifies one single instance where a psychopath flew his plane into his house to kill not just his wife but his child as well.

Sorry love, that’s not masculine anything. That’s called psychopathy.

An article talking about one case specified one case? No shit. We can still see a pattern.

We have thousands of articles of one instance where a man tries to kill his wife or gf and does or does not succeed but they are all each just individual cases nothing to see here.

Each earthquake is its own individual earthquake. It has no meaning or pattern. Life’s just crazy uwu

“thousands of articles”

Okay so who is making up fake statistics now?

Let’s consider some facts:

2 million articles get posted daily

2.5 women are killed by male partners each day

Not all murders are talked about in the news

Some murders are talked about extensively by every media outlet

Let’s just say 1/10 of domestic violence victims are talked about in the news, each one time, that would mean 91.25 articles are published each year. Over a ten year period that would be almost one thousand. Since we know some cases get dozens of stories themselves and that there are hundreds of media outlets that all cover similar stories that figure goes up extensively. It’s not even a question of there being thousands.

>mentions statistics of abuse factoring in male victims, majority of which are unreported and many of which are female abusers

>”wow don’t make up statistics that’s not true at all”

>says thousands of articles exist, doesn’t prove this data is factual

>”its okay tho because they don’t get published or talked about!”

No shit abuse happens. We know it happens. That doesn’t validate the concept that all of one sex are incarnate evil, nor does it invalidate that the ones who do these acts of violence are fucked up in the head.

These cases you bring up? Individual male assailants. All unrelated to one another. No connection. No proxy. Nothing. Their acts are pursued by free will and the drive to harm others alone. That isn’t toxic masculinity or whatever the fuck you’re trying to call it. That’s a psychopath out to harm others. Point blank period.

@drakenotingale violence against women is the background noise of society

mahunkel:

radbian:

mahunkel:

radbian:

mahunkel:

radbian:

mahunkel:

fandomsandfeminism:

auntiewanda:

fandomsandfeminism:

chocobbunnii:

trans women don’t get to speak on behalf of women

if you have a different opinion you can go fuck yourself

Cis women dont get to speak on behalf of all women either. Especially white cis ablebodied women.

So, conveniently, only people of the male sex get to speak for women. Amazing.

Literally no one said that. Good try.

Fuck, I’ll say it: as only trans women have genuinely universally female experiences, only trans women get to speak for all women. The rest of us can sit down and shut the fuck up.

Females don’t have female experiences? Only trans women do?

Please explain how that makes any sense whatsoever

It’s pretty simple, not that I’d expect a TERF to understand simple shit.

Cis women have non-universally female experiences, such as menstruation.

Only trans women have purely universal female experiences, such as experiencing misogyny, because only their experiences can be experienced by both trans and cis women.

So, from here on out, cis women don’t get to speak for all women. Only trans women do.

Fucking yikes.

I guess trans woman can only speak for men too since they have experienced puberty and male socialization and trans men can only speak for men.

The amount of self hate you have and the hate you have for females is just really sad. You are actually brainwashed by men to think they are not only the authority on everything male but on everything female as well. And you are not only being spoon fed it but you are actively harassing females for men and doing their dirty work for them. You are a lackey. As soon as you say one wrong thing you will be labeled a terf as well.

Care about mentstruation? About getting sanitary products to girls in need? Terf

Care about pregnant women’s health and the high rates of death during/after birth? Terf

Mention a baby girl being raped? Terf

I’ll gladly stand by females. It’s too bad I can’t use the word women anymore since it’s been hijacked. Even saying terfs aren’t real women? You just sound like a misogynistic brat. You might want to stop burning down all your ridges before the trans cult turns on you.

Ew. Look at this fucking bigot, on my fucking blog, everybody. I go to all the trouble of telling it the truth about the world, and all it can do is come back with more TERF bullshit.

To the TERF: you ain’t a woman. You got no claim to the name. You ain’t even a “female”. You just an “it” honey, go be a TERF in the TERF playground and miss my blog from now on.

I’ll be over here with my real sisters in the trans and lesbian communities. Go fuck another genderless being womanhood was forced onto or whatever TERFs believe they are this week.

I thought you were supposed to respect pronouns, even of rapists, but you are calling me an it? Whew the hypocrisy.

If you ever wanna read something other then propaganda I suggest my “trans violence” tag.

I respect your gender! That’s just it! You’re a TERF, so you’re not a woman. You’re a bigot, so you’re not a human. You get “it”.

If you ever wanna see what all TERFs deserve, then I suggest a google image search for “Nazis getting punched”. Just substitute those bigots for yourselves.

Translation: “I respect made up gender identity but I hate you as a woman so much that I will deny you are even women or human”.

Violence against women isn’t a good look