one-single-verse:

radbadanddangeroustoknow:

RadFem culture is explaining that “radical” as it’s used in academia means “at the root.” Then explaining if you haven’t been blocked yet that when you use the word “liberal” it is not used as adjective meaning “open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values,” but the political meaning of “favoring maximum individual liberty in political and social reform.” The conflict radfems have with liberals and neoliberals is a fundamental conflict that should be shared byanyone who claims to be a communist or socialist or some related subgroup. That is focus on the good of the individual instead of the class. Leftist thought prior to the infestation of post modernism was always predicated upon class analysis.

It has nothing with willingness to dismiss outdated ideas. Ideas like the concept of gender.

This literally reads like you had an assignment that required you to use all the vocabulary words from one chapter of your gender theory/woman studies book that was written by the professor who’s pretending to teach ‘groundbreaking’ sociological concepts, but you read the assignment as having to be in 500 characters as opposed to 500 words.

I don’t think you know how to use quotation marks either ironically or correctly, judging from your use of them here.

What is it with you and quotation marks?

Considering you support transgenderism I am not sure why you are mocking gender studies

You look like you majored in advanced queer theory

revofem321:

radfem-lyanna-mormont:

Y’all ever notice that there are like, no trans men in the trans rights movement with the level of visibility anywhere NEAR what trans women get? (The only exception I can think of is Chaz Bono but he has celebrity parents so he’s kind of a special case.) Tbh it reminds me of how men who are like “Misogyny is bad!” get 10000000x more praise than feminist women.

Like idk I can’t possibly think of what might be causing this discrepancy…………

Misogyny.

revofem321:

radfem-lyanna-mormont:

Y’all ever notice that there are like, no trans men in the trans rights movement with the level of visibility anywhere NEAR what trans women get? (The only exception I can think of is Chaz Bono but he has celebrity parents so he’s kind of a special case.) Tbh it reminds me of how men who are like “Misogyny is bad!” get 10000000x more praise than feminist women.

Like idk I can’t possibly think of what might be causing this discrepancy…………

Misogyny.

memelovingradfem:

terfbjorn:

if you think “feminist, woman-focused porn” is being made for a reason other than that there’s a growing market for it and thanks to sex pos liberal feminism a profit can be made off it, you’re wrong

if you think it actually helps women inside (and outside) the sex industry, you’re wrong

the production of “feminist, woman-focused porn” does nothing to make disgusting violent porn disappear, and it does nothing to help the women who are trapped in the porn industry and are forced or coerced to participate in their own degradation and abuse. it only opens up a new part of the porn industry in which (usually more privileged) women can sell their bodies and fool themselves into thinking that they’re doing something good

if you support “feminist, woman-focused porn,” you’re still supporting
women being sold. it’s just that the product is less overtly
exploitative and violent. it’s still selling women and women’s bodies,
just in a more palatable way. and it won’t replace the overtly exploitative and violent porn. it just adds another kind of porn alongside it.

Wasn’t a “feminist” porn studio found to be hiring known rapists as performers?

Can’t remember names but I remember reading something about it a while ago

I think that company was called knee pad. I looked them up but I found porn links.

They hired a trans males to be a porn performer and he turned out to be a rapist.

They wouldn’t do anything because he raped women in his personal life so he got away with it.

memelovingradfem:

terfbjorn:

if you think “feminist, woman-focused porn” is being made for a reason other than that there’s a growing market for it and thanks to sex pos liberal feminism a profit can be made off it, you’re wrong

if you think it actually helps women inside (and outside) the sex industry, you’re wrong

the production of “feminist, woman-focused porn” does nothing to make disgusting violent porn disappear, and it does nothing to help the women who are trapped in the porn industry and are forced or coerced to participate in their own degradation and abuse. it only opens up a new part of the porn industry in which (usually more privileged) women can sell their bodies and fool themselves into thinking that they’re doing something good

if you support “feminist, woman-focused porn,” you’re still supporting
women being sold. it’s just that the product is less overtly
exploitative and violent. it’s still selling women and women’s bodies,
just in a more palatable way. and it won’t replace the overtly exploitative and violent porn. it just adds another kind of porn alongside it.

Wasn’t a “feminist” porn studio found to be hiring known rapists as performers?

Can’t remember names but I remember reading something about it a while ago

I think that company was called knee pad. I looked them up but I found porn links.

They hired a trans males to be a porn performer and he turned out to be a rapist.

They wouldn’t do anything because he raped women in his personal life so he got away with it.