maramcgregor:

inlandwest:

GOP Platform Proposes To Get Rid Of National Parks And National Forests


By Jenny Rowland / Think Progress 7/15

The Republican platform committee met this week to draft the document
that defines the party’s official principles and policies. Along with
provisions on pornography and LGBT “conversion therapy” is an amendment calling for the indiscriminate and immediate disposal of national public lands.

The inclusion of this provision in the Republican Party’s platform
reflects the growing influence of and ideological alliance between
several anti-park members
of the GOP and anti-government extremists, led by Cliven Bundy, who
dispute the federal government’s authority over national public lands.

“Congress shall immediately pass universal legislation providing a
timely and orderly mechanism requiring the federal government to convey
certain federally controlled public lands to the states,” reads the
adopted language. “We call upon all national and state leaders and
representatives to exert their utmost power and influence to urge the
transfer of those lands identified.”

The provision calls for an immediate full-scale disposal of “certain”
public lands, without defining which lands it would apply to, leaving
national parks, wilderness areas, wildlife refuges, and national forests
apparently up for grabs and vulnerable to development, privatization,
or transfer to state ownership.

Keep reading

You do realize that “certain” federally controlled public lands would also include Native American reservations. Here’s an excerpt from the Department of the Interior about this:

In the United States there are three types of reserved federal lands:  military, public, and Indian.  A federal Indian reservation is an area of land reserved for a tribe or tribes under treaty or other agreement with the United States, executive order, or federal statute or administrative action as permanent tribal homelands, and where the federal government holds title to the land in trust on behalf of the tribe.

Approximately 56.2 million acres are held in trust by the United States for various Indian tribes and individuals.  There are approximately 326 Indian land areas in the U.S. administered as federal Indian reservations (i.e., reservations, pueblos, rancherias, missions, villages, communities, etc.).  The largest is the 16 million-acre Navajo Nation Reservation located in Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah.  The smallest is a 1.32-acre parcel in California where the Pit River Tribe’s cemetery is located.  Many of the smaller reservations are less than 1,000 acres.

Some reservations are the remnants of a tribe’s original land base.  Others were created by the federal government for the resettling of Indian people forcibly relocated from their homelands.  Not every federally recognized tribe has a reservation.  Federal Indian reservations are generally exempt from state jurisdiction, including taxation, except when Congress specifically authorizes such jurisdiction.

It’s all well and good to claim that the GOP are trying to destroy the environment. But they are also after the few lands left in control of the Native American peoples. This would give them the authority to put oil pipelines through sacred tribal sites and continue the systematic desecration of the native cultures. And we KNOW this is what they want to do. And not just in the midwest, all over the country through a bunch of different reservations. Have some links about that (x, x, x)

This isn’t just about the environment. This is racism and greed and the continued destruction of the native peoples’ lives and cultures.

live-through-this:

tittyrants:

fire-lord-frowny:

It really, REALLY bothers me when I hear people frame climate change and other environmental crises as something that everyday, average-ass people are responsible for, and not corporations and entire governments. 

Like literally, how can a regular-ass person ~opt out~ of all damaging behaviors while still being able to function in society? 

You literally can’t. 

The future of our planet is not down to whether or not someone recycles their water bottle. 

It’s down to whether or not governments and corporations decide to quit sucking up all our resources and poisoning the earth with reckless abandon. 

I mean obviously people should still live as cleanly and as sustainably as they can manage where they are and with what they have, but like. THAT isn’t the major issue. 

govts and corporations have deliberately put the onus on yr individual choices so the system can continue being as destructive/profitable

And they manipulate us into spending more money for a more ~sustainable life~ while it does exist and is important it is not going to make as much of a significant change

deepgreenresistance:

Indigenous peoples all over the world have traditional food practices that emanate from intimate and respectful relationships with the living land—the real world around them. This kind of humble intimacy celebrates the life-death-life cycle, and changes with the seasonal rhythms of plants and fellow creatures. Though indigenous foods vary wildly according to climate and bioregion, long experience has informed practices of gathering, hunting, and polyculture gardening. Deep green resisters respect this.

Industrial culture disconnects everything from its source and destroys everything in its path; it has no concern for relationship with the land. Industrial foods, whether vegan, vegetarian, or animal-based, are produced with injustice and ecocide.

Modern activists should pay heed: nearly all of humanity’s history was spent living harmoniously with the land. Only in the last 10,000 years has civilization and agriculture existed, with the last 200 years of industrialized civilization doing more damage than ever before, as topsoil and fossil fuels are mined for a temporary abundance of cheap, grain-based food. Any sustainable future must be based on the limited capacity of the land to feed a limited number of human societies in perpetuity.

Our identification needs to be with the real world. The real world needs to be protected.

http://ift.tt/15Dit6r http://ift.tt/1NtmwML

 Environmental activists shouldn’t make comment on Indigenous people hunting and eating meat they know how handle resources.