“In Sudan, where the Personal Status of Muslims Act of 1991 allows children – boys or girls – as young as 10 to marry, 38 percent of young women were married before the age of 18.”
Tag: islam
“In Sudan, where the Personal Status of Muslims Act of 1991 allows children – boys or girls – as young as 10 to marry, 38 percent of young women were married before the age of 18.”
It seems like the agenda of ‘progressive Muslims’ like Linda Sarsour and Dalia Mogahed is not to make Islam more progressive, but to make progressivism more Islamic. They don’t critique the veil as a mark of the second-class status of women, they want to keep the veil and change people’s perceptions of it. They don’t want a sober look at the immorality and inconsistency of the Qur’an, they want to keep the scripture and get critics to water themselves down lest they be insensitive. As I type this it’s dawning on me that this is the trend in ‘Leftism’ all along the line. Erstwhile progressives are joining arms with the most regressive political forces on offer, for the purpose of giving these forces a rebrand. Progress is turned on its head: it no longer means abandoning harmful traditions, it’s abandoning the recognition that those traditions are harmful at all.
Linda Sarsour is trash. She said Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Brigitte Gabriel deserve and ass whippin and that she wishes she could “take their vaginas away. They don’t deserve to be women”
It seems like the agenda of ‘progressive Muslims’ like Linda Sarsour and Dalia Mogahed is not to make Islam more progressive, but to make progressivism more Islamic. They don’t critique the veil as a mark of the second-class status of women, they want to keep the veil and change people’s perceptions of it. They don’t want a sober look at the immorality and inconsistency of the Qur’an, they want to keep the scripture and get critics to water themselves down lest they be insensitive. As I type this it’s dawning on me that this is the trend in ‘Leftism’ all along the line. Erstwhile progressives are joining arms with the most regressive political forces on offer, for the purpose of giving these forces a rebrand. Progress is turned on its head: it no longer means abandoning harmful traditions, it’s abandoning the recognition that those traditions are harmful at all.
Linda Sarsour is trash. She said Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Brigitte Gabriel deserve and ass whippin and that she wishes she could “take their vaginas away. They don’t deserve to be women”
Islamic Feminism is a Myth
The ousting of Moroccan scholar Asma Lamrabet lays bare the falsity of claims by mostly Western conservative Muslims that Islam is the most feminist religion once again.
Ms Lamrabet, chief of the Center of Women Studies in Islam at the Mohammaden League, who argues for gender equality in religious interpretation, was asked to resign over her vocal support for equal inheritance for women. The Mohammaden League is an Islamic institute which serves as a guardian of Islamic tradition and interpreter of Islamic jurisprudence. Although it was during Lamrabet’s time that ML began to appoint women to become Adouls (traditional notaries at the Mohammedan league), allowing women’s participation in witnessing acts of marriage, divorce and inheritance, it seems its steps towards gender equality for women are still baby ones.
The incident is exemplary of the rapid social changes in the Islamic world where emotions are running high between conservative Islamist interpreters and those who believe in defining their religion in light of modern social developments. It makes clear the disparity between modern definition of equality and what is allowable under Islam. The beliefs of orthodox Muslims and the notion of human equality irrespective of caste, color or creed still remain at odds.
Despite this, we frequently see Muslim women in the West insisting that Islam is “the most feminist religion” or arguing that Islam and feminism go hand in hand despite layers and layers of contradictions when we try to compare both sets of values without even going into the ethical debate. The term “Islamic feminism” indicates an engagement with feminist discourse which draws on Islamic theology. It takes the Quranic concept of all humans being equals in the eye of God but by upholding theological explanations for societal roles assigned to men and women, it perpetuates a structure which sees women living with far fewer powers than men.
The Cairo Declaration (1990) is considered the parallel charter of human rights in the Islamic world but it still doesn’t treat women and members of other religions as equal to Muslim men. Instead it assumes that women’s rights should be directly derived from the religious texts. This makes it much harder for woman to claim their place in society since interpretations, while differing in many ways, have long been dominated by conservative views on how women should conduct themselves socially.
This is in stark contrast to feminism which is rooted in the belief that women should be treated equally in legal, economic and social institutions regardless of religion, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity and nationality which is far more inclusive than any religious definition of a free woman. One wonders why Islamic feminists feel the need for a separate, religious qualifier when Muslim women have, for decades, been striving for equality as part of a global movement for human rights, with conservative patriarchal religions forming the main sources of resistance.
The concept of Islamic feminism is strongly criticized by secular feminists who are Muslim and believe that the idea of a specifically Islamic feminism is intrinsically flawed and self-contradictory. Mahnaz Afkhami is a Iranian Muslim and liberal feminist who describes this contradiction between Feminism and Islam eloquently. She says,
“Our difference with Islamic feminists is that we don’t try to fit feminism in the Qur’an. We say that women have certain inalienable rights. The epistemology of Islam is contrary to women’s right…I call myself a Muslim and a feminist. I am not an Islamic feminist – that’s a contradiction in terms.”On the most recent Women’s Day, women living in Muslim majority countries including Iran, Pakistan, and Turkey took to the streets shouting out loud their need for fundamental rights which are infringed by religious hardliner states. Turkish women walking down the streets of Ankara calling out the sharia-compliant state’s indifference towards women were met with tear gas and arrests. A day before International women’s day, an Iranian woman who later became the symbol of resistance against the theocratic regime, was jailed for two years because she dared to challenge the misogynistic mandatory religious dress code by hoisting her hijab on a stick.
These women are fighting the customs and regulations which oppress them in the name of divine laws. The bitter reality of living in a highly orthodox religious society is quite opposite to the values that “Islamic feminism” supposedly represents. Such societies are built on inflexible religious ideas that define “respect” for women exclusively in religious terms, and therefore regard any demand for genuine equal rights as a rebellion against the state.
The Western world, while not perfect, has adopted the secular values that provide equal standing for all members of society, both religious and non-religious, after centuries of persecution. Nevertheless, Muslim women privileged enough to be born and raised in Western democratic societies behave as though they are obliged in one way or another to give all credit for their rights to religion. Meanwhile, globally, the majority of Muslim women routinely have their human rights snuffed out by cultural and religious manifestations sprouting from theological discourse.
Furthermore, under the pretext of wishing to avoid hurting the feelings of a religious minority, Western liberals and the mainstream media routinely brush all discussion of religiously motivated abuses under the rug. While they are busy protecting the feelings of religious hardliners, they neglect the safety and human rights of many other Muslims. For many progressive Muslims and ex-Muslims, it is heart-breaking when Westerners act as apologists, supporting the demands for Sharia-compliant “rights” made by Islamist women in the West. We seldom hear these human rights activists talking about the oppression of women in theocratic states, especially in the Muslim majority world.
The callous indifference churned out by some modern media outlets and filmmakers who shamelessly boast about the “rights” religion(s) gave to women, especially in Middle Eastern culture, deliberately ignore the hell that so many women actually go through there.
A recent documentary produced by the BBC presented several western Muslim women who waxed proud about being “empowered” by the religion but seemed oblivious to the real-life issues imperiling Muslim women and minors. It was appalling to see both the host and the Muslim women guests brag about being virgins, when this status does nothing to elevate women’s autonomy but limits their social status relative to their desirability to men for the prospect of “marriage.” This defines female power entirely in relation to men and marriage — the polar opposite of feminism.
One woman claimed Islam to be “the most feminist religion” and described herself as “as randy as the next one” before asserting that she is “still holding on to the no sex before marriage thing.” She forgets to mention that she was able to say this because she was in a Western country, which protected her freedom of such expression whereas she might have been incarcerated for publicly uttering such desires in a Sharia state, despite being a Muslim hijabi.
A peek into the Muslim world today explodes the myth of “Islamic feminism.” Saudi women are fighting against an infantilizing guardian system that treats them as second-class citizens or children. Irani women are calling out the brutal facets of the oppressive regime. They are imprisoned and tortured by the Iranian authorities for showing the slightest glimpse of their head or other forbidden body parts in public. Even in Western countries Muslim women have to go through similar situations on top of unfathomable abuses like female genital mutilation, honor killing and halala practices, which mock all of the progress and sexual equality that characterize modern civilization.
This is a betrayal on the part of non-Muslim liberals and a deception on the part of radicalized Muslim women who come forward to pretend that women are revered in Muslim world. They frequently claim they are duty-bound to import the same marvelous practices to the modern world in order to give a glimpse of “heaven-sent lifestyle” to Western women too. Attaching the word “Islamic” to the activities of conservative Muslim women in the developed world hints at Islamist motives in making these values acceptable in the West.
Many of these Islamic “feminists,” despite knowing the above-mentioned facts, try to reconcile religious sources with a feminist viewpoint inspired by Western feminism. Yet they fail to acknowledge and account for the abysmal gap between the lifestyle of modern women and their counterparts living in religious authoritarian societies. Taking this stance shuts down discussion and limits awareness of Muslim women’s plight and exacerbates their miseries. Only secular laws can help women achieve their rightful place in the society. Finding refuge for women’s rights under organized religion remains a myth no matter how hard one shouts that theirs is a “feminist” religion.
Muslim feminist /Islam is feminist is an oxymoron , you can’t be both , each ideology completely opposes the other.
“Morals aside, a pedophile is somebody attracted to children, a rapist is somebody who has sex with another person without their consent. Mohammed had sex with a child, and children cannot consent to sex. So by definition, without even getting into the morality of it, he is a pedophile rapist.
Don’t even bother getting into the whole “it was different back then, muh life expectancy and maturity levels” argument, because it is flawed as all hell. If I were to go to Sierra Leone which has a life expectancy in this day and age of 50 years and fucked a kid, you know what it would make me? It would make me a pedophile rapist. The way human biology and brain development works is completely unrelated to a statistic as arbitrary as human life expectancy. It’s like saying that people died young back then was a fact of life that was acceptable, and the young life expectancy proves that it was OK for that to happen. No, people died young back then because we didn’t know any better when it came to sanitation and medical treatment. […] The same goes for marrying children out to 50 year old men. Treatment of mental health let alone physical health was barely even touched upon until the last 2 centuries, so its not too much of a stretch to say that they weren’t too interested in the unconsidered at the time effects of child marriages.
Just because it was the norm 1400 years ago doesn’t mean that it is in any way shape or form acceptable, and before you try and call me out on my morals being subjective, think of it this way: Would you appreciate that thing being done to you? Treat others as you would like to be treated is really the only moral “guideline” you need to follow. Would you appreciate your 9 year old daughter being fucked by a 54 year old man? I’d say probably not. Would you like to become a slave, or assaulted for your religious beliefs, or stolen from? The answer to all of those things is no.”—
“Morals aside, a pedophile is somebody attracted to children, a rapist is somebody who has sex with another person without their consent. Mohammed had sex with a child, and children cannot consent to sex. So by definition, without even getting into the morality of it, he is a pedophile rapist.
Don’t even bother getting into the whole “it was different back then, muh life expectancy and maturity levels” argument, because it is flawed as all hell. If I were to go to Sierra Leone which has a life expectancy in this day and age of 50 years and fucked a kid, you know what it would make me? It would make me a pedophile rapist. The way human biology and brain development works is completely unrelated to a statistic as arbitrary as human life expectancy. It’s like saying that people died young back then was a fact of life that was acceptable, and the young life expectancy proves that it was OK for that to happen. No, people died young back then because we didn’t know any better when it came to sanitation and medical treatment. […] The same goes for marrying children out to 50 year old men. Treatment of mental health let alone physical health was barely even touched upon until the last 2 centuries, so its not too much of a stretch to say that they weren’t too interested in the unconsidered at the time effects of child marriages.
Just because it was the norm 1400 years ago doesn’t mean that it is in any way shape or form acceptable, and before you try and call me out on my morals being subjective, think of it this way: Would you appreciate that thing being done to you? Treat others as you would like to be treated is really the only moral “guideline” you need to follow. Would you appreciate your 9 year old daughter being fucked by a 54 year old man? I’d say probably not. Would you like to become a slave, or assaulted for your religious beliefs, or stolen from? The answer to all of those things is no.”—
The Prophet Mohammed was a Chad
don’t fight me on this
He started the religion because he was an incel
*prepares to fight*
He was actually the kept-boy husband of a successful business woman before he started the religion. The whole multiple wives thing happened after her death.
He had an boy as a sex slave?
I heard his first wife was the dominant one
He wouldn’t dare have the collectable wives while she was still alive
He WAS the boy. He married a much older woman when he was like 15. He worked for her caravan and was basically her little bitch. As far as I know he never had a sex slave. I was using kept-boy here figuratively not literally.
Sorry I misread that. That explains his attitude and behaviour towards women.
Why did he marry an older woman?
That wouldn’t have been a common practice at the time (to my knowledge)
He definitely had sex slaves later in life. It is well recorded.
The Prophet Mohammed was a Chad
don’t fight me on this
He started the religion because he was an incel
*prepares to fight*
He was actually the kept-boy husband of a successful business woman before he started the religion. The whole multiple wives thing happened after her death.
He had an boy as a sex slave?
I heard his first wife was the dominant one
He wouldn’t dare have the collectable wives while she was still alive
He WAS the boy. He married a much older woman when he was like 15. He worked for her caravan and was basically her little bitch. As far as I know he never had a sex slave. I was using kept-boy here figuratively not literally.
Sorry I misread that. That explains his attitude and behaviour towards women.
Why did he marry an older woman?
That wouldn’t have been a common practice at the time (to my knowledge)
He definitely had sex slaves later in life. It is well recorded.
Amna Al-Juaid is a Saudi woman who has been missing since October 24th .
Her father was forcing her to marry her cousin and when she refused he took her out of collage, stopped her from going to work and isolated her from society .
She managed to run away and was living with a friend ..
as a strong independent woman she wanted to re-issue her national ID in order to get a job since her father had it when she ran away ..
As a runaway she was considered a wanted criminal and was arrested and put into dar alreaya which is a housing system for women who’s families disown them ..Please spread Amna’s story and demand that she be released !!
Is there new information since the 24th of October?