Nordic model in France

antiporn-activist:

Since the French law to reduce sex trafficking was enacted a year ago, 937 people have been arrested for buying sex, according to the Coalition for the Abolition of Prostitution (CAP), which consists of 18 global charities providing support to victims of sexual exploitation.

“Sex buyers are now recognised as people who sexually exploit women in vulnerable situations with their financial power,” said CAP Chief Executive Gregoire Thery in a phone interview with the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

“The aim is to reduce the scale of prostitution, pimping and trafficking in France. To remove the repression of victims, and remove the impunity of the exploiters.”

Thery said there are between 30,000 and 40,000 sex workers in France – nearly 90 percent of them are victims of human trafficking, mainly from Bulgaria, Romania, China and Nigeria.

Nordic model in France

Vatican Operating Secret Brothels For Catholic Priests…

high-infidelity:

celtyradfem:

high-infidelity:

skeptic42:

confrontingbabble-on:

Read http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3313341/Vatican-properties-operating-BROTHELS-massage-parlours-priests-claims-latest-reports-Vatileaks-scandal.html

And http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/vatileaks-scandal-vatican-properties-used-as-brothels-and-massage-parlours-where-priests-pay-for-sex-a6729251.html

And http://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2015/11/report-vatican-operating-secret-brothels-for-catholic-priests/

In order to fight sin, one must understand it to the fullest extent possible.

It also keeps some of them from chasing the choir boys.  Maybe they ought to make it mandatory.

If things like these keep priests from abusing children, I’m all for it.

Of course it would be better if these places operated legally, which would make it safer for everyone involved, but then churches would have to address the huge hypocrisy of openly condemning a practice they don’t just condone in secret, but are also directly responsible for.

It’s a catch 69.

“If things like these keep priests from abusing children, I’m all for it.”

It

doesn’t. The church and other patriarchal
institutions have a long history of selling or appointing women and
children to abusive men. It doesn’t reduce rape or sexual abuse
committed by men against women and children. At no point in the history
of women’s oppression has this
‘plan‘ worked. In fact it has lowered women’s status and made us even
more vulnerable to abuse and rape.

Sexual abusers don’t do
it just because they are sexually frustrated and need to have sex or
else
they will do bad things. This is not how rape or sexual abuse works. You
should read feminist work about this topic. They have been extensively
researching and writing about this for decades.

Johns often
buy children and teenagers. The johns who do this either don’t care or
they prefer it
that way. They still pay to abuse and rape women and children. Things
like sporting events are hot spots for sex trafficking and they often
find teenagers there along with women (even when it is legal).

“Of course it would be better if these places operated legally, which would make it safer for everyone involved“

Regardless of whether they are in the sex industry or not, legalisation
does not actually prevent violence or abuse against women and children. Legalisation
allows the illegal sector grow to which means more even more
trafficking, abuse and rape. The legal sector is not safe either it is
full of abuse, violence and exploitation so it isn’t safer just more
regulated (which doesn’t make it safe for the women in the sex industry).

Having
a subclass of women available to be used and sexually abused does not make abusive
men stop abusing women and children. This is not a preventative
strategy this just outsources the misery. It is also a great way to
hide the exploitation, abuse and sexual violence against the women and
children victimised in prostitution.

Let me guess: you are one of those feminists who don’t believe any prostitute ever in the history of humanity has gone into the business on their own, or for any other reason than being exploited by evil men?
What about porn stars? what about male prostitutes? what about people who actually enjoy sex, and prefer to work selling it than having a job that pays less and is equally exploiting but less satisfying?

Legalizing prostitution would also go a long way to prevent abuse and traffic situations, especially exploitation of minors, in the same way as legalizing alcohol increases quality control of the product and enforces stricter penalties for those who sell to minors. Contrary to your statement, it will decrease the illegal sector, since right now the whole industry is illegal, and nothing is preventing traffickers from abusing victims but supply and demand. By making it legal, demand for something that could get you in trouble will substantially decrease in favor of the stuff that is allowed. Prostitutes themselves would have more legal resources and will not be afraid to be compromised by calling the authorities when they are abused, not to mention they will not need to depend on thugs to extort them for “protection” since they will be protected by the law like any other legal professionals.

I’m not trying to say that all potential abusers would choose this route, or that sexual abuse would magically disappear, even within the sex industry itself. But for as little positive effect as it might have, it will no doubt be better than how things are in most parts of the world, and you can take a look at studies made in places where they depenalized or legalized it to see the positive effect it’s had.

“Let me guess: you are one of those feminists who don’t believe any prostitute ever in the history of humanity has gone into the business on their own, or for any other reason than being exploited by evil men?”

You guessed right which is to say an actual feminist with actual feminist positions not a sex industry proponent or someone browbeaten by pro prostitution proponents.

Also pointing to a few women who claim to be ok with it doesn’t negate the majority who want out immediately and systematic oppression. Also yes, johns are scumbags.

“Business on their own” this kind of language is deliberately used to obscure economic disenfranchisement, previous abuse, addiction and many other coercive factors that push women into prostitution. I can see what you are doing.

My turn to guess. You think women and girls ‘choose‘ prostitution not that men as a class create the demand and do everything in their power make sure there is a sub class of women for sexual use and abuse.  This is misogynist don’t do it.

“What about porn stars?“

Here is an extensive list of female porn performers speaking out on the exploitation, abuse and violence in pornography.

Here is a former porn performers speaking out about what goes on in the legal California porn industry.

Read through them. I can go get more if you want.

What about male prostitutes?”

The vast majority of sex buyers are male and this includes men buying other men and boys. It still isn’t ok.

“Legalizing prostitution would also go a long way to prevent abuse and traffic situations, especially exploitation of minors, in the same way as legalizing alcohol increases quality control of the product and enforces stricter penalties for those who sell to minors..”

This analogy doesn’t work when human beings are dehumanised and are the considered ‘product‘ by the buyers.

The Nordic model criminalises sex-buyers and third party sellers and decriminalises prostituted people while offering them services and housing. This is the most effective model to help improve prostituted women and children quality of life, reduce violence and abuse and gives them a chance at justice.

“Contrary to your statement, it will decrease the illegal sector”

In Amsterdam and Germany the have a HUGE trafficking problem. Most of the prostituted women in these countries are not local. 

It isn’t difficult to understand that if you legalise prostitution you give traffickers the greenlight and cover. They can use legalisation plausible deniability to get away with it.

Also under legalisation the women who are not able to meet the regulation standards still need money to survive end up in non-regulated prostitution. The Nordic model is the best strategy because it decriminalises prostituted people. offers them services and protections.

“I’m not trying to say that all potential abusers would choose this route”

You claimed that prostitution would help lower rape and abuse rates. Violent men have not decreased violence against women recently or historically. It doesn’t work. I told you it doesn’t work. That was my point. 

The underlying argument there was that pedophiles (and abusers) would take their frustrations out on prostituted women which would ‘protect’ children despite this clearly not working. This is also cruel and unethical why would you want those kind of guys around prostituted women?

“or that sexual abuse would magically disappear, even within the sex industry itself. But for as little positive effect as it might have”

What positive effects are you referring to?

Who do the ‘postive effects’ benefit?

Do you have any evidence of this?

(I told you earlier that prostitution doesn’t decrease sexual violence.)

“Prostitutes themselves would have more legal resources and will not be afraid to be compromised by calling the authorities when they are abused, not to mention they will not need to depend on thugs to extort them for “protection” since they will be protected by the law like any other legal professionals.“

Those thugs are still there they are just in suits. Even in areans where it is legalised rape, abuse, trafficking even murder are common. In many legalised/decriminalised places they make the prostituted women pay for security and they are obliged to ‘tip’ certain people for things that are not actually their responsibility to pay for. There is plenty of extortion and the violent men are still there.

Why would exploiters, traffickers and abusive/violent men leave the sex industry because it is legalised?

“it will no doubt be better than how things are in most parts of the world”

The only countries that have been able to successfully counter act trafficking and abuses in the sex industry are the countries that have implemented the Nordic model. Trafficking, rape and violence decreases under the Nordic model.

“you can take a look at studies made in places where they depenalized or legalized it to see the positive effect it’s had.“

I have seen the studies and even pro-prostitution show that legalisation and full decriminalisation doesn’t work in favour of prostituted women. 

Under the Nordic model is the far more helpful and offers better legal protection because the upper hand because johns and pimps are already breaking the law.

lt is the most efficient way to reduce trafficking by criminalising the demand side of things (sex buyers/johns) and the third part profiteering side of things (pimps/brothel owners/traffickers etc).

Vatican Operating Secret Brothels For Catholic Priests…

Legalizing prostitution would decrease the social stigma of sex work. Prostitution is something that’s gonna happen anyways and it doesn’t usually include immediate risk for those who participate in. Of course legalizing wouldn’t solve all problems but when it’s illegal the focus is on trying to make it stop rather than taking care of the workers. People do dangerous work all the time but regulation can make it safer. Why is prostitution different?

no-amanda:

I wish it worked that way, but it doesn’t. I live in a country with legalized prostitution and work unions for prostitutes, yet there is still a gigantic social stigma. As a prostitute, you are being paid to transform into an object, a commodity for someone who is willing to use you. I think stigma would never disappear from that.

Prostitution is something that’s most likely going to happen at the moment, because there are people willing to pay for sex. This is why we should work towards a society in which people understand that individuals are not purchasable. If someone does not want to be friends with you, does not want to marry you, does not want to love you, does not want to donate you their organs or does not want to have sex with you -then you cannot replace that denied consent with money. This is a capitalistic fantasy and it is an extremely dangerous idea in a society that thrives on the lack of equality, like the one we currently live in. It leads to inevitable exploitation. Full legalization will lead to normalization of this exploitation.

You say that prostitution doesn’t usually include immediate risk for those who participate in it. There are, however, no statistics to back that up, but lots of research that tells otherwise. This study, for example, says that 71% of prostitutes have been physically assaulted and 89% would leave the trade immediately. Many experience PTSD. Even in countries with legalization, like the Netherlands, it has not lead to significant fewer incidences. The idea that it would lead to safer environments seems to be false

If you wish to read more about it: Here are some more common myths with fully researched answers. Here you can read more facts about prostitution. I would also highly recommend Rachel Moran’s book about the subject.

I do not support full criminalization, because that would have negative consequences for prostitutes. However, I support the nordic model, in which pimping people and paying for sex are criminalized, but prostituting isn’t. This way prostitutes can always look for help without fearing the government or the police. Combined with the increased investments in exit programs, this seems to reduce stigma, fear and crime the most.

I have replied to a remark like this one before here, where I talk a little more about the subject and link to more articles, would you be willing to find those.

Thanks for reading.

– LEGALIZED PROSTITUTION IN AUSTRALIA: BEHIND THE SCENES…

antiporn-activist:

“My first  job  in a brothel, I started to think : « I can’t do this anymore, I can’t take it, I am starting to hate every man I see, even in my general life ». I wanted to leave and I thought I could leave, so I left. That was where prostitution is legal.

Two weeks later, I was walking down the street in a different suburb, far away from the brothel, when two men, twice my size—I mean 6 foot 5, huge men –started to run across the road towards me as I was walking . I thought they were running after someone else but they came up to me, they shoved their fist in my face and told me : « you have to go back to work »–  and left me there. So they physically intimidated me for this so-called high class brothel where politicians go, where we were supposed to be all free and safe—but it’s all bulls…t. They told me I had to go back to work, or they would be coming to bash me…”

This is definitely worth reading.

– LEGALIZED PROSTITUTION IN AUSTRALIA: BEHIND THE SCENES…