feminism-for-me:

Identifying as non binary or genderqueer does nothing to destroy the gender binary. It in fact enforces it by saying everyone who IDs as a man or woman, falls strictly into those gender roles that have been pushed onto us, and doesn’t deviate from those norms.

When you think of man and woman as personality/identity categories, in which gender roles are intertwined (women wear dresses/act in a certain way etc) the grip of the gender binary is tightened as anyone GNC is pushed out and further isolated.

When you think of man and woman as nothing more than biological categories (male and female) we are free from gender roles. A woman can be anything she wants to be. We can break those chains, but we can’t do it while simultaneously following postmodern gender theory.

you saying that “transwomen are males” is transphobic like srsly, please educate yourself intersectionally wtf? you are transphobic. your “feminism” is transphobic. your “feminism” is therefore bullshit. also feminism is not just for women, it’s for all genders. it’s about gender equity. please stop promoting transphobia and transmisogyny. your brand of fake white “feminism” works for no one and only perpetuates the very cisnormative systems that oppress us. PLEASE PLEASE EDUCATE YOURSELF, geez

gotdaemitsuga:

celtyradfem:

gotdaemitsuga:

celtyradfem:

gotdaemitsuga:

celtyradfem:

gotdaemitsuga I have educated myself and the idea of ‘cis privilege‘ contradicts the fact that women are discriminated on the basis of our sex and gender is a patriarchal construct that is designed by men to keep women subordinated. This is basic feminist class analysis. Trans ideology is not compatible with feminism.

The concept of ‘cisgender’ or ‘cissexism’ doesn’t make sense and it’s implications are anti feminist. Go look up the world health organisation’s definition of sex and gender and educate your self on what feminists have been saying about gender for decades (long before this ‘cisgender’ bullshit was popularised).

Feminism is about women not males who claim to be women. Feminism is female centric for a reason. The end goal of feminism is ending patriarchy not making up new ‘genders‘ (which does not address female oppression). 

Lol you are beyond help, my friend. At least be less obvious

You can’t argue against what I said because you have no argument. I made what I said really obvious. If you need help go look up the world health’s organisation’s definition of gender and what feminists have been saying about gender. I mean feminists not queer theory idiots (like judith buter).

Uhh what the fuck? You hella transphobic AND you gon be a homophobe?? LMAO I get it, you’re an MRA in disguise ha! 😉 okay okay I see you, good game good game

Yo minusthemushrooms you seent this? I can’t with these I can’t!! 😂😂😂

Do you know what queer theory is? it is the ideology that ‘gender identity‘ is based on and judith butler is one of its proponents (and yes it is called queer theory I am not making this up).

Oh my god Susan, of course I know Judith!! me and all my queer brown Trans intersectional feminist homies on that shiet !! you clearly on a diff level if you’re gonna discount queer theory wtf lol

gotdaemitsuga ‘gender identity’ and trans ideology like ‘cis privilege’ and ‘all genders’ is based on queer theory (judith butler is a proponent). What I am saying is you believing in ‘all genders’ is believing in an ideology a Susan popularised. Basically you believe in bullshit a Susan made up. You are gullible and believe in bullshit made up by white academia.
 

you saying that “transwomen are males” is transphobic like srsly, please educate yourself intersectionally wtf? you are transphobic. your “feminism” is transphobic. your “feminism” is therefore bullshit. also feminism is not just for women, it’s for all genders. it’s about gender equity. please stop promoting transphobia and transmisogyny. your brand of fake white “feminism” works for no one and only perpetuates the very cisnormative systems that oppress us. PLEASE PLEASE EDUCATE YOURSELF, geez

gotdaemitsuga:

celtyradfem:

gotdaemitsuga:

celtyradfem:

gotdaemitsuga I have educated myself and the idea of ‘cis privilege‘ contradicts the fact that women are discriminated on the basis of our sex and gender is a patriarchal construct that is designed by men to keep women subordinated. This is basic feminist class analysis. Trans ideology is not compatible with feminism.

The concept of ‘cisgender’ or ‘cissexism’ doesn’t make sense and it’s implications are anti feminist. Go look up the world health organisation’s definition of sex and gender and educate your self on what feminists have been saying about gender for decades (long before this ‘cisgender’ bullshit was popularised).

Feminism is about women not males who claim to be women. Feminism is female centric for a reason. The end goal of feminism is ending patriarchy not making up new ‘genders‘ (which does not address female oppression). 

Lol you are beyond help, my friend. At least be less obvious

You can’t argue against what I said because you have no argument. I made what I said really obvious. If you need help go look up the world health’s organisation’s definition of gender and what feminists have been saying about gender. I mean feminists not queer theory idiots (like judith buter).

Uhh what the fuck? You hella transphobic AND you gon be a homophobe?? LMAO I get it, you’re an MRA in disguise ha! 😉 okay okay I see you, good game good game

Yo minusthemushrooms you seent this? I can’t with these I can’t!! 😂😂😂

Do you know what queer theory is? it is the ideology that ‘gender identity‘ is based on and judith butler is one of its proponents (and yes it is called queer theory I am not making this up).

people need to make up their mind! Either sex and gender are one in the same, or they aren’t. If they’re the same thing, then transwomen can’t exist because there’s no need to transition. If they’re NOT the same thing, then transwomen are biologically male (sex) who experience dysphoria and therefore transition from man to woman. There is no stable argument, I swear, it’s “whatever works in this case” or something… which, would make one fail a basic deductive reasoning course…

asiatiqu3:

celtyradfem:

vulvapeople:

appropriately-inappropriate:

I’ve had a few logic professors who would have dearly wanted to throw some textbooks had they read it. 

It’s ad homs, strawmans, appeals to emotion, contradictory points… 

The whole thing is a mess. They say “Trans women have female bodies because they say they do!” Well, but if they say they do, then why is the alternative term for them “Male to Female”? If they say they do, then why transition? If they say they do, then why are they dysphoric? 

It doesn’t make any sense, it’s not internally consistent and it changes depending on who the Big Name of the day is. 

It’s like reading shitty fanfiction–nothing makes sense and everyone’s contradicting themselves. 

Seems like that’s what you get when your movement is based on individualism and personal freedom.  On that front, I don’t really care how people choose to see themselves and define themselves; it’s when they think they have a right to dictate to me how I’m “allowed” to behave, then I have a problem.

The current trans movement is very much like a religion that tries to force even non-believers to follow its dictates.

It is impossible to talk to them because they can’t keep their story straight.

This is why I became gender critical/abolitionist to be honest. There were so many flaws and contradictions everywhere, and nothing made sense because it wasn’t consistent.

Because queer theory/trans politics is is based on individual identity (self concept and feelings) so pretty much every thing they say is subjective. They over complicate things that are simple and can’t explain why they are right they just say things like ‘lmao‘, ‘lolololol‘ or ‘that’s transphobic’ to well thought out arguments. Just asking what they mean by anything is like pulling teeth. You would think that they would want people to understand their positions instead of writing long paragraphs that don’t really say anything.

pogoniptrail:

ravefromthegrave:

porcupunx:

female-only:

lesbianseparatist:

off our backs, august-september 1999

#rf #postmodernism #she called it #off out backs

“It is a theory, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”

Amazing I can’t even.

postmodernism came into vogue in academia just when the voices of women and people of color began to assert a significant presence there

“The real agenda is masked in clever obfuscation–to preserve the status quo by rendering dissent meaningless….”

This is what queer theory, trans ideology and gender identity is about.