The lessons I had to learn.. (Part One)

thetuffmuff:

image

Back in my ignorant youth, I distinctly remember defending pornography.  My liberal tendency to protect women’s sexual empowerment interfered with the ability to think critically about porn. In reality, viewing porn at a young age left me feeling physically ill. What I saw being done to women’s bodies confused me, terrified me and at no point did I ever feel empowered. Since becoming a radical feminist,  I’ve learned many lessons about pornography. 

Lesson #1: Feminist pornography doesn’t matter. 

Back in the day, I argued that feminist pornography existed and that it was a positive step towards women’s sexual liberation. I argued that women in pornography were simply exercising their own choices and who was I to criticize that choice. I utilized any liberal excuse I could think of to justify the existence of the porn industry. Words like “agency” and “ individual choice” spewed from my mouth. Of course,  I acknowledged that there were indeed bad parts to pornography that were made by deranged individuals but I insisted that it wasn’t reflective of industry itself. When I entered into the world of radical feminism, the liberal rhetoric I would normally used was defeated by the stories women would tell me about pornography and how it had affected them.. When looking at the bigger picture of women’s lives, it doesn’t matter that feminist pornography exists. 

I’m sure out there in this vast society, there is porn that doesn’t degrade women. I’ve personally never seen it but sure, okay…it exists out there…. somewhere. The problem is not that it exists or that it’s even being labelled as “feminist”;  The problem is that feminist pornography is not the problem. Yet liberal feminists and men alike (surprise, surprise) are quick to run to the defense of the “not all that bad” pornography.  

I hate this assertion that “it’s not all that bad”. Not because I don’t believe the assertion but because it’s not the point. The point is that the BULK MAJORITY of porn is misogynistic and that is what men are watching. The market for feminist pornography is a teeny tiny niche of people who want to avoid the normal misogyny portrayed in porn but still want to  get off by being creepy voyeurs. 

In preparation for writing this post, I hesitantly researched feminist pornography and came across an informative website. And what I noticed is that there is no definitive difference between feminist porn and mainstream porn with the exception that feminist porn features more female directors as well as LGBTQ performers/themes. 

Otherwise, the language and images shown are more or less the same. Women (or MTF trans) are still submissive, holes are still “pounded” and women are still bitches and sluts. 

The reality is that words like bitch and slut are used relentlessly in all pornography as a way to humiliate and degrade women  much like they are used in real life by men to harass women in the streets when their advances are dismissed. These words are used by men when female co-workers are perhaps being overbearing or demanding or ya know..doing her job. In the eyes of men, these words make it easy to reduce a  woman, no matter their position in the world, into a thing to fuck. And this is reinforced by pornography. 

Calling something feminist doesn’t make it so. Especially porn. No matter who is behind the camera. 

image

Lesson #5: Being critical of porn does not make you a prude.

I’ve been anti-porn for about five years and so far, have been accused of being “fanatical”, “prudish”, “moralistic”, and “sex negative”. While most of the accusations are baseless, I’m always a bit dismayed by the notion that I’m “anti-sex” or “sex-negative”.

Let me set the record straight for anyone (ahem…men) who make these assumptions about people (cough…mostly women…cough) who speak out against the porn industry:  There is nothing to be prudish about rejecting porn ‘cause it got nothin’ to do with sex. What people fail to understand is that I am critical porn because I want to defend sex. I want to protect it. I want sex to be as fulfilling as it can be for those who want it. Whether its a one night stand or part of a long-term relationship, sex should be have some elements of respect, intimacy and connection.

Lesson #6: Men use pornography to attack women. 

Thank fuck I found radical feminism in my early twenties. Radfems, who picked up their pens and said what needed to be said, inspired me to reject the porn industry.  However, it wasn’t just the writings of Andrea Dworkin and Gail Dines that challenged my views on pornography. 

It was women calling the rape crisis line I volunteered at. It was the formerly prostituted women I worked with. It was women who had been forced to watch pornography with her boyfriend. It was prostituted women who were gang raped by johns as the cameras were rolling. It was women who were manipulated by their boyfriends to ‘act out’ scenes they had seen in pornography. It was women who were groomed by pornography as young children before being raped by male family members. 

It was women, survivors, who taught me that pornography is not empowerment and will not liberate us. 

What I do know is that liberation will come when we open our mouths, tell our truths and not give a fuck about the liberal excuses. 

image

inqilabi:

The number of men who have very specific things that turn them on (like actual arousal) from non-sexual things like straight hair or curly hair, or skirts, is absolutely astounding to me. It still literally blows my mind and at times I refuse to believe that this is a the case cos it’s so wild to me…but then again, why am I surprised? What did I expect in a society where men don’t view women as whole beings. Where sexuality is utterly divorced from anything actually substantial such as emotions. Where men are compartmentalizing something so natural and simply as getting turned on, into a set of fixed performances and fixed patterns. That’s not how it is suppose to be!!!

inqilabi:

The number of men who have very specific things that turn them on (like actual arousal) from non-sexual things like straight hair or curly hair, or skirts, is absolutely astounding to me. It still literally blows my mind and at times I refuse to believe that this is a the case cos it’s so wild to me…but then again, why am I surprised? What did I expect in a society where men don’t view women as whole beings. Where sexuality is utterly divorced from anything actually substantial such as emotions. Where men are compartmentalizing something so natural and simply as getting turned on, into a set of fixed performances and fixed patterns. That’s not how it is suppose to be!!!

antiplondon:

bernoullifeminism:

So, someone tagged me in this yesterday.

Some country lifestyle instagram account posted this. Clearly, it’s directed at men.

I cannot get over the idea that women are placed in competition with other animals that are commonly hunted for sport. With animals that are seen as prey. Men view women as prey.

Men view women as prey.

There is no incongruity in describing the disposition to shoot wild
animals to death as loving, if one correctly understands the vocabulary
being used. “Love” here simply means the desire to possess those
creatures who interest or excite the hunter. Taking possession typically
entails killing the animal, eating the flesh, and mounting the head or
the entire body. The identification between “loving” and possessing by
killing and mounting is made in the following hunter’s comments
regarding two ducks he shot and stuffed: “‘I saw these mountain ducks
and fell in love with them,’ says Paul, the tone of his voice matching
the expression he wears in the photo with the Dall sheep – one of most
tender regard for something precious. ‘I just had to have a pair of
them.’ Aldo Leopold – hunter, forest manager, and founding father of
modern environmental ethics – described the trophy as a “certificate”
attesting to the hunter’s success in “the age-old feat of overcoming,
out witting, or reducing-to-possession.” And Jose Ortega y Gasset, who
wrote the outstanding statement of twentieth-century sports-man’s
philosophy, defined hunting by both humans and non humans as “what an
animal does to take possession, dead or alive, of some other being that
belongs to a species basically inferior to its own.”

Brian Luke, “Violent Love: Hunting, Heterosexuality, and the Erotics of Men’s Predation”, Feminist Studies, 1998.

https://antipornfeminists.wordpress.com/2012/08/11/beautiful-birds-in-awkward-positions/

wahbegan:

travelling-cat-salesman:

rootfauna:

positive-memes:

This is the future, grandpa

Because unlike the past few generations breasts are everywhere. They’re barely considered soft core porn now. Men have become desensitized to the point where instead of fantasizing about women’s breasts they’re fantasizing about her being double penetrated while choking to the point of vomiting on a dildo. Breasts aren’t explicit enough for todays men. 

first y’all complain breasts aren’t sexual organs now you’re annoyed men agree with you lmaooo

No, listen, she’s right. The over-sexualization of women’s bodies and the desensitization of young boys and men to all but the most extreme and violent erotic images are not opposite ends of the same spectrum they’re related problems. The omnipresence of boobs and half-naked women in marketing, advertising, movies, etc doesn’t mean they’ve been de-sexualized. They are still sexualized, but we’ve grown used to it. It’s just a baseline level of objectification and lust. For men to actually get turned on now, to get a hard-on they have to turn to increasingly more extreme forms of porn because of its addictive and desensitizing nature, both things which have been demonstrated in several psychological studies btw. Millennial men haven’t desexualized breasts. But the sight of a topless woman alone isn’t enough to get a dude jerking off now. An image that would have had you cumming in your pants at age 12 is still considered sexual, just not sexual enough. I believe the point @rootfauna is making correct me if i’m wrong is that breasts are still considered sexual organs, enough to be obscene and warrant objectification, harassment and assault, but now they’re not sexual ENOUGH by themselves, to arouse a real desire to fuck there needs to be a violent power fantasy to go with them

wahbegan:

travelling-cat-salesman:

rootfauna:

positive-memes:

This is the future, grandpa

Because unlike the past few generations breasts are everywhere. They’re barely considered soft core porn now. Men have become desensitized to the point where instead of fantasizing about women’s breasts they’re fantasizing about her being double penetrated while choking to the point of vomiting on a dildo. Breasts aren’t explicit enough for todays men. 

first y’all complain breasts aren’t sexual organs now you’re annoyed men agree with you lmaooo

No, listen, she’s right. The over-sexualization of women’s bodies and the desensitization of young boys and men to all but the most extreme and violent erotic images are not opposite ends of the same spectrum they’re related problems. The omnipresence of boobs and half-naked women in marketing, advertising, movies, etc doesn’t mean they’ve been de-sexualized. They are still sexualized, but we’ve grown used to it. It’s just a baseline level of objectification and lust. For men to actually get turned on now, to get a hard-on they have to turn to increasingly more extreme forms of porn because of its addictive and desensitizing nature, both things which have been demonstrated in several psychological studies btw. Millennial men haven’t desexualized breasts. But the sight of a topless woman alone isn’t enough to get a dude jerking off now. An image that would have had you cumming in your pants at age 12 is still considered sexual, just not sexual enough. I believe the point @rootfauna is making correct me if i’m wrong is that breasts are still considered sexual organs, enough to be obscene and warrant objectification, harassment and assault, but now they’re not sexual ENOUGH by themselves, to arouse a real desire to fuck there needs to be a violent power fantasy to go with them

tehbewilderness:

drziggystardust:

onesongbeforeigo:

home-of-amazons:

pitsu-pitsu:

this is literally the best thing ever

another bunch of tossers exploiting a woman’s body for straight male arousal to piss off religious right wingers, wow, sure showed those homophobes

if you want people to think porn is liberating and harmless, then maybe don’t use it as a weapon against people you dislike.

I don’t care how shitty the people you hate are – using sexuality to attack people is always creepy and inappropriate.

women’s bodies are not political tools for you to use (and yeah I know she consented). This “protest” has all the thought and relevancy of something eighth grade boys would come up with. It has nothing to do with gay rights and everything to do with them wanting to seem edgy and powerful.

Stop using us as an excuse to be obnoxious shits because this does nothing to help gay people

BOOM

The religious authoritarian men and the pornographer authoritarian men have been fighting for years over how to position the boot on women’s necks.

Here is the illustration of that fact.