Cowardly-custard silveritemine must have blocked me,
because I can’t even reblog my own post! It’s ridiculous to claim that radical and
anti-porn feminists are using Bundy (or any other serial killer) as a ‘mascot’
(that is entirely not what ‘mascot’
means).
Their original premise that a serial killer might be lying about
being a prolific porn user (for whatever reason) is laughable, and as someone else
already pointed out, Bundy was talking about his porn use after being found guilty and being sentenced to death.
And most ridiculous of all is the idea that it might be
possible (putting aside whatever any serial killer may say), that there is, in
the secular, global north, a sub-set of men (who are not from a religious
minority back-ground), who commit extreme sexual violence and murder against
women, children, and vulnerable men, but at the same time have absolutely no
interest in pornography! They want to commit sexual violence but do not seek
out images of sexual violence!
The mental gymnastics some people will go through to defend porn are quite amazing!
This blocking thing on tumblr is really bizarre, @dagr8estterf reblogged this post
from me yesterday, but I can’t reblog from her, because the original op blocked
me!
But I can still look at silveritemine’s blog, I hadn’t seen
before the tags they used:
It’s such a stupid claim, and frames the whole ‘debate’
completely falsely, no radical feminist is giving any serial killer a platform
to talk about anything, studying someone is not giving them a platform! What silveritemine
is saying is, it’s wrong to study serial killers to find out what fuels the
most extreme misogynist behaviour.
It’s not like ‘sex workers’ don’t encounter men like this
all the time, should we not listen to women in the sex industry when they tell
us about their bad experiences?
The first loyalty of sex industry advocates is to the sex
industry itself, and they will distort and misrepresent radical feminism in the
most ridiculous ways imaginable.
That idiot blocked me too
They can’t handle disagreement so they leave snarky responses that don’t make sense then slam the block button declaring themselves the winner
I don’t understand this ideological purity mindset that you can’t even use bad people as sources to illustrate a point because that must mean you agree with them.
Cowardly-custard silveritemine must have blocked me,
because I can’t even reblog my own post! It’s ridiculous to claim that radical and
anti-porn feminists are using Bundy (or any other serial killer) as a ‘mascot’
(that is entirely not what ‘mascot’
means).
Their original premise that a serial killer might be lying about
being a prolific porn user (for whatever reason) is laughable, and as someone else
already pointed out, Bundy was talking about his porn use after being found guilty and being sentenced to death.
And most ridiculous of all is the idea that it might be
possible (putting aside whatever any serial killer may say), that there is, in
the secular, global north, a sub-set of men (who are not from a religious
minority back-ground), who commit extreme sexual violence and murder against
women, children, and vulnerable men, but at the same time have absolutely no
interest in pornography! They want to commit sexual violence but do not seek
out images of sexual violence!
The mental gymnastics some people will go through to defend porn are quite amazing!
This blocking thing on tumblr is really bizarre, @dagr8estterf reblogged this post
from me yesterday, but I can’t reblog from her, because the original op blocked
me!
But I can still look at silveritemine’s blog, I hadn’t seen
before the tags they used:
It’s such a stupid claim, and frames the whole ‘debate’
completely falsely, no radical feminist is giving any serial killer a platform
to talk about anything, studying someone is not giving them a platform! What silveritemine
is saying is, it’s wrong to study serial killers to find out what fuels the
most extreme misogynist behaviour.
It’s not like ‘sex workers’ don’t encounter men like this
all the time, should we not listen to women in the sex industry when they tell
us about their bad experiences?
The first loyalty of sex industry advocates is to the sex
industry itself, and they will distort and misrepresent radical feminism in the
most ridiculous ways imaginable.
That idiot blocked me too
They can’t handle disagreement so they leave snarky responses that don’t make sense then slam the block button declaring themselves the winner
I don’t understand this ideological purity mindset that you can’t even use bad people as sources to illustrate a point because that must mean you agree with them.
Honest, nothing is funnier to me than “radical” feminists citing Theodore fucking Bundy as a source. If there were any better indicator that radical feminism is an absolute joke.
Oh, you mean notorious serial killer and serial rapist of women Ted Bundy?
Violent misogynist Ted Bundy?
Consummate liar and manipulator Ted Bundy? That guy’s your anti-porn spokesman? Seems legit, I guess.
holy shit wtf
Ohhhh my god no, people are actually using Ted Bundy’s “porn made me do this” bullshit as a legitimate argument???
They are using the ‘porn has an influence on predatory behaviour and exposure to porn normalises and encourages sexual violence’ argument.
There has even been porn based on Bundy’s murders. So there is definitely a feed back loop.
Not to mention whenever they catch a predator they inevitably find porn related to their crimes on their computers.
back in Ted Bundy’s day it was hard to get your hands on the shit he was watching
he wasn’t fucked up because of the porn he watched, he watched he porn he watched because he was fucked up
which is still a decent argument against porn imo
I think porn fucked him up even more and gave him a few ‘ideas’. It would have normalised it in his mind and made him more confident to act out what he did.
The question is would he have been as vicious if he didn’t watch the porn he did?
Honest, nothing is funnier to me than “radical” feminists citing Theodore fucking Bundy as a source. If there were any better indicator that radical feminism is an absolute joke.
Oh, you mean notorious serial killer and serial rapist of women Ted Bundy?
Violent misogynist Ted Bundy?
Consummate liar and manipulator Ted Bundy? That guy’s your anti-porn spokesman? Seems legit, I guess.
holy shit wtf
Ohhhh my god no, people are actually using Ted Bundy’s “porn made me do this” bullshit as a legitimate argument???
They are using the ‘porn has an influence on predatory behaviour and exposure to porn normalises and encourages sexual violence’ argument.
There has even been porn based on Bundy’s murders. So there is definitely a feed back loop.
Not to mention whenever they catch a predator they inevitably find porn related to their crimes on their computers.
back in Ted Bundy’s day it was hard to get your hands on the shit he was watching
he wasn’t fucked up because of the porn he watched, he watched he porn he watched because he was fucked up
which is still a decent argument against porn imo
I think porn fucked him up even more and gave him a few ‘ideas’. It would have normalised it in his mind and made him more confident to act out what he did.
The question is would he have been as vicious if he didn’t watch the porn he did?
Honest, nothing is funnier to me than “radical” feminists citing Theodore fucking Bundy as a source. If there were any better indicator that radical feminism is an absolute joke.
Oh, you mean notorious serial killer and serial rapist of women Ted Bundy?
Violent misogynist Ted Bundy?
Consummate liar and manipulator Ted Bundy? That guy’s your anti-porn spokesman? Seems legit, I guess.
holy shit wtf
Ohhhh my god no, people are actually using Ted Bundy’s “porn made me do this” bullshit as a legitimate argument???
They are using the ‘porn has an influence on predatory behaviour and exposure to porn normalises and encourages sexual violence’ argument.
There has even been porn based on Bundy’s murders. So there is definitely a feed back loop.
Not to mention whenever they catch a predator they inevitably find porn related to their crimes on their computers.
Honest, nothing is funnier to me than “radical” feminists citing Theodore fucking Bundy as a source. If there were any better indicator that radical feminism is an absolute joke.
Oh, you mean notorious serial killer and serial rapist of women Ted Bundy?
Violent misogynist Ted Bundy?
Consummate liar and manipulator Ted Bundy? That guy’s your anti-porn spokesman? Seems legit, I guess.
holy shit wtf
Ohhhh my god no, people are actually using Ted Bundy’s “porn made me do this” bullshit as a legitimate argument???
They are using the ‘porn has an influence on predatory behaviour and exposure to porn normalises and encourages sexual violence’ argument.
There has even been porn based on Bundy’s murders. So there is definitely a feed back loop.
Not to mention whenever they catch a predator they inevitably find porn related to their crimes on their computers.
Honest, nothing is funnier to me than “radical” feminists citing Theodore fucking Bundy as a source. If there were any better indicator that radical feminism is an absolute joke.
Oh, you mean notorious serial killer and serial rapist of women Ted Bundy?
Violent misogynist Ted Bundy?
Consummate liar and manipulator Ted Bundy? That guy’s your anti-porn spokesman? Seems legit, I guess.
it’s not “citing him as a source” it’s using him as an example of a male serial killer who may have been fueled or inspired by pornography in some way, because that is both an anecdotal and statistical trend you fucking dolt
You really think a serial killer would do that? Just go into an interview and just tell lies?
Ted Bundy lied about his porn use why?
You think it’s realistic to suggest that rapists and serial
killers are in the minority of men who don’t use porn?
Why the fuck would he lie about his and other violent men’s porn use…???? Serious question, what could he have possibly benefited from saying that? And yeah clearly porn having a major influence on male violence (Bundy isn’t the only case, dipshit) totally means nothing.
Damn some people on Tumblr are straight up dense as shit lmao.
Even if you think he’s completely lying and was never influenced by porn you can’t seriously believe that constantly consuming media depicting violence against women for enjoyment doesn’t effect men’s image of women. You can’t be that fucking stupid right???
I never said that. I said you can’t trust Ted Bundy. Why are radfems so desperate to use him as their fucking poster boy?
I mean if anyone was going to be a poster boy for the “porn is evil and makes men violent” movement who better than Ted Bundy??? He was a serial killer.
Yes he was a master manipulator and I can’t tell you what his motivations were in that interview. Attention? Sympathy? Shifting the blame to the media? Who knows but I honestly don’t doubt that he was speaking some truth when what he was saying is just observable reality. Violence and pornography is everywhere in the media, it is readily available to children and it effects their levels of violence and attitudes towards women.
Well, if a serial murderer and rapist agreed with something I thought, I would try to distance myself from that person. Even if it was proven that I was right, I would not want to be associated with someone who committed such evil actions. You see, I’m a good person.
“You see, I’m a good person”
This is what this is all about, isn’t it? You’re looking for good person points. Which explains your anti radfem stance. There is plenty of idiots who will give you validation for that.
Citing Ted Bundy as an ‘straight from the source’ example isn’t really agreeing it is using him to make a point.
If you used the knowledge of a con artist to make a point or counteract fraud. It doesn’t make you a con artist as well. It means you are taking advantage of what they know.
Honest, nothing is funnier to me than “radical” feminists citing Theodore fucking Bundy as a source. If there were any better indicator that radical feminism is an absolute joke.
Oh, you mean notorious serial killer and serial rapist of women Ted Bundy?
Violent misogynist Ted Bundy?
Consummate liar and manipulator Ted Bundy? That guy’s your anti-porn spokesman? Seems legit, I guess.
it’s not “citing him as a source” it’s using him as an example of a male serial killer who may have been fueled or inspired by pornography in some way, because that is both an anecdotal and statistical trend you fucking dolt
You really think a serial killer would do that? Just go into an interview and just tell lies?
Ted Bundy lied about his porn use why?
You think it’s realistic to suggest that rapists and serial
killers are in the minority of men who don’t use porn?
Why the fuck would he lie about his and other violent men’s porn use…???? Serious question, what could he have possibly benefited from saying that? And yeah clearly porn having a major influence on male violence (Bundy isn’t the only case, dipshit) totally means nothing.
Damn some people on Tumblr are straight up dense as shit lmao.
Even if you think he’s completely lying and was never influenced by porn you can’t seriously believe that constantly consuming media depicting violence against women for enjoyment doesn’t effect men’s image of women. You can’t be that fucking stupid right???
I never said that. I said you can’t trust Ted Bundy. Why are radfems so desperate to use him as their fucking poster boy?
I mean if anyone was going to be a poster boy for the “porn is evil and makes men violent” movement who better than Ted Bundy??? He was a serial killer.
Yes he was a master manipulator and I can’t tell you what his motivations were in that interview. Attention? Sympathy? Shifting the blame to the media? Who knows but I honestly don’t doubt that he was speaking some truth when what he was saying is just observable reality. Violence and pornography is everywhere in the media, it is readily available to children and it effects their levels of violence and attitudes towards women.
Well, if a serial murderer and rapist agreed with something I thought, I would try to distance myself from that person. Even if it was proven that I was right, I would not want to be associated with someone who committed such evil actions. You see, I’m a good person.
“You see, I’m a good person”
This is what this is all about, isn’t it? You’re looking for good person points. Which explains your anti radfem stance. There is plenty of idiots who will give you validation for that.
Citing Ted Bundy as an ‘straight from the source’ example isn’t really agreeing it is using him to make a point.
If you used the knowledge of a con artist to make a point or counteract fraud. It doesn’t make you a con artist as well. It means you are taking advantage of what they know.
Celtyradfem 