joanofrad:

lesbiani:

This is how trans “women” and trans activists really are lmao here is a whole ass white man telling a black woman he is trying to get her deported for the crime of not buying into gender shit. But these are “intersectional” feminists who are “anti fascist” and “anti racist,” except if they can use institutional racism to inflict harm on a black woman. Fucking sickos lmao

Wow, just wow. These white people are trying to get a black woman deported for stating basic biological facts, while thinking they’re on the right side of history. Identity culture is the whitest shit ever!

Don’t agree with your ideological opponents?

Can’t have an honest debate on its own merits?

Just report them to immigration and report them to Twitter

Censored by Trans Politics: A Masterpost

aurorevallee:

transgender-harms-women:

[See the Read-First Introduction before proceeding]

CENSORED BY TRANSPOLITICS: A MASTERPOST

                                                    TIER 1

MURDER OF PEOPLE WHO QUESTION TRANSGENDER PEOPLE/IDEOLOGY

  1. Psychotherapist
    Rita Powers murdered by her patient, a transwoman, because
    Powers didn’t think he was an appropriate candidate for sex reassignment
    surgery
    Note, in the link, that the transgender community blamed Powers for
    being murdered, saying that if she had just given her patient what he
    wanted, she would still be alive. In other words, ‘she asked for it.’
    Sound familiar?

                                                  TIER 2

ASSAULT OF PEOPLE WHO QUESTION TRANSGENDER PEOPLE/IDEOLOGY

  1. Cheryl Partsch punched in teeth for questioning cross-dressing man in women’s restroom.
    His punch cost her $60K in medical bills. Note that Patrick doesn’t identify as a woman, but still punched Cheryl in the teeth for being concerned about his presence in the women’s restroom, and called her questioning a “hate crime.”
  2. Feminists assaulted in Transgender Attack at Portland conference for Social Change
  3. Violent Zoey Tur grabs panelist by the neck and threatens to send him “home in an ambulance” live on the air
    The panelist’s crime? Mentioning biology.
  4. UK
    trans athlete Lauren Jeska, attempts to murder an official and attacks
    two other officials from British Athletics for reviewing the medals won
    while competing as a woman.
     Lauren Jeska is male.

                                                   TIER 3

ECONOMIC PUNISHMENTS
(SUCH AS UNEMPLOYMENT OR LEGAL FINES)
OF PEOPLE WHO QUESTION TRANSGENDER PEOPLE/IDEOLOGY

  1. Rochester Radio Hosts Fired After making transgender jokes
  2. General fired from academic post over transgender bathroom joke
  3. Gavin McInnes fired for thought catalog post, “Transphobia is Perfectly Natural”
  4. Daycare workers fired for ‘misgendering’ confused student
  5. ESPN fires Curt Schilling for sharing a ‘transphobic’ meme
  6. Transactivists attempt to fire Meghan Murphy for writing about Laverne Cox
  7. Transwoman & business owner Janelle Bahan threatens to fire any woman who might be a feminist
  8. Woman’s Planet Fitness Membership cancelled for concern over transwoman in locker room
  9. Transactivist attempts to fire ‘transphobe’ Elizabeth Hungerford for her Open Letter to Smith College
    Worthy of note: The same transactivist is now trans-critical, has since
    apologized, and now experiences abuse from the trans community.
  10. Vassar College transactivist students attempt to fire Professor
  11. New York City enacts $$$ 6-figure fine for “misgendering”*
  12. Canada Prime Minister Justin Trudeau introduces bill that punishes “misgendering” with up to two years in prison*
    * Challenge for transactivists: can you find any comparable punishments
    for people who call women bitches, sluts, cunts or whores? Hell, most
    rapists don’t even face consequences this severe for raping people.
  13. YMCA fires rape victim for expressing fear of being raped in gender neutral bathrooms
  14. Georgia ACLU leader Maya Dillard Smith pressured to resign after asking too many questions about transgender bathroom bill
  15. Transactivists violently harass, deplatform and attempt to fire Ruth Barrett
    Because she signed a petition and had an opinion about MichFest. How dare she!
  16. Macy’s fires Catholic employee for disagreeing with transgender bathroom policy
    The policy was never made known to him, and he promised to uphold the policy, but they still fired him.
  17. Renee Gerlich is banned from a community book market and subsequently lost her job and was the target of a bullying pact launched against her by a trans spokesperson from the New Zealand Prostitutes’ Collective.

                                                  TIER 4

THE NO-PLATFORMING, DISINVITATION, EVENT CANCELLATION, UNPUBLISHING AND CENSORSHIP
OF PEOPLE WHO QUESTION TRANSGENDER PEOPLE/IDEOLOGY

BOLD links = this person has been deplatformed repeatedly
(Meaning, this list is longer than it looks.)

  1. Derrick Jensen disinvited from Oregon State University over “transphobia” (Response)

  2. Lawrence University invokes last minute BAN on Earth Day Keynote Speaker Lierre Keith due to her Feminist views on Gender

  3. Rachel Ivey of Deep Green Resistance “End of Gender” presentation cancelled at Bluestockings…   …and at Unitarian Church of Philadelphia

  4. Julie Bindel repeatedly deplatformed for her gender-critical views
  5. Lesbian activist stripped of Grand Marshall honors over “transphobic” Facebook posts
  6. Cindy Sheehan talks about being targeted by “trans bullies”
  7. Glosswitch commissiond, then un-commissioned, to write for feminist site
    even though she was initially told she could write “ANYTHING”
  8. Janet Mock and followers target GenderTrender blog, shut it down & suspend blogger
  9. Campus “Vagina Monologues” cancelled for being about vaginas (which is “exclusive” to transwomen)
  10. Lesbian Outsmart review of Julia Serano’s “Excluded” removed from website for “insensitive” trans-critical remarks
  11. New York Times transgender/gay rights debate features 2 transwomen, 4 gay males, but NO women or lesbians
  12. Christine Benvenuto essay removed, AND bookshop event cancelled, after petition & harassment by her transwoman ex-spouse
  13. Bev Jo disinvited from Butch Voices by transwoman
  14. Iconic Michigan Women’s Music Festival ends after long fight over trans-inclusivity
    Organizers were threatened for years by transacitivists for having a female-only vision of the festival
  15. Vulva Cupcake event called “violent” – transactivists attempt to cancel it
  16. Woman’s Bruce Jenner rant deleted by YouTube
  17. Iconic feminist Carol Adams targeted by “transphobia” misinformation/deplatforming campaign
    No evidence of her alleged transphobia was ever provided by her accusers.
  18. PantheaCon female-only spiritual rites infiltrated by transactivists
    Sex-specific events are no longer allowed at PantheaCon — not even
    traditional rites based on exclusively female experiences such as
    menstruation, which have always been deeply revered in many Pagan
    traditions
  19. Kate Smurthwaite’s comedy show cancelled for “transphobia”
    even though she’s demonstrably supportive of trans people
  20. Female Erasure Book faces pre-emptive attacks
  21. Royal College of Psychiatrists Transgender Conference cancelled after trans complaints
  22. Cardiff University cancels Germaine Greer lecture after trans-critical remarks
  23. Sheila Jeffreys targeted by “transphobia” de-platforming campaign
  24. Jeremy Clarkson Amazon Show cancelled for trans-critical remarks
  25. Potentially $568
    million in economic damages, countless event cancellations, and
    corporate withdrawals and in North Carolina following HB2 decision
  26. Everyday Feminism pulls article by Alice Dreger about sex ed; cites disagreement about ‘trans issues’
  27. For Books’ Sake takes down, apologizes for, sharing FeministCurrent articlecalls it transphobic but does not explain how it’s transphobic
  28. Ruth Greenberg denied venue for lesbian-focused, trans-inclusive event based on year-old “transphobic” tweet
  29. Thistle Pettersen banned from the community radio station,
    WORT 89.9 FM, AND she was also prevented from organizing a yearly
    women-focused music & arts festival in Madison, WI due to
    accusations of ‘transphobia’.
    Please take the time to read this one, if you can: PART 1, PART 2, PART 3, PART 4.
  30. Professor tells student she is not allowed to share trans-critical views during class discussions
  31. Twitter bot corrects tweets that “misgender” Caitlyn Jenner
  32. Vancouver Women’s Library harassed and threatened for having “TERF” and “SWERF” literature in their catalogue.
    This is despite the fact that the library is trans-inclusive. According to this Guerrilla Feminist Collective post, transactivists have also assaulted a library visitor and stolen the library’s sign.
    Support the VWL by donating and signing this petition!
  33. Thistle Pettersen has again been silenced and pressured to not perform at an event she started organizing.
  34. Rhéa Jean, author and PhD, was accused of transphobia and censored from speaking at a seminar on the transgender movement.   The seminar was cancelled.
  35. Meghan Murphy has
    a post she wrote for rabble arguing against Planned Parenthood’s
    dehumanizing use of the word ‘menstruators’ to describe women censored
    without notice or explanation. When pressed, she finally got a response
    claiming the post includes ‘transphobic language.’ To date no one has explained exactly what that ‘transphobic language’ was. She quit in protest.

                                                TIER 5

SOCIAL EXCLUSION, DOXXING, HARASSMENT, GENERAL INTIMIDATION
OF PEOPLE WHO QUESTION TRANSGENDER PEOPLE/IDEOLOGY

  1. Laci Green doxxed for saying “tranny” years ago, even though she apologized
    Yes, THE Laci Green that liberal feminists love so much.
  2. Cathy Brennan was stalked and harassed by a group of transactivists in Olympia for refusing to say that a homosexual male could also identify as a lesbian.

There are so many open threats of violence made against trans-critical people, particularly against lesbians and/or radical feminists, that I cannot list them all. So I’ll summarize instead:

WITHDRAWAL OF SUPPORT

Transactivists are known to threaten to withdraw support for
feminist causes/organizations if they fail to openly pledge allegiance
to transgender ideology. Many such organizations are in desperate need
of social support and funding, so they don’t have much of a choice
except to go along with what transactivists tell them to say.

The message is clear: “Your rights are important, but validating my beliefs is more important.”

One example:

image

SOCIAL MEDIA PHASE-OUTS

Ask ANY radical /gender critical/trans critical feminist, and they will
tell you: we get deleted, harassed, banned and blocked more than anyone.
Many of us have lost real-life friends over trans-critical Facebook
posts or even for asking questions. It seems that transactivists patrol
Facebook for the slightest hint of “transphobia” so they can pile-on and
virtue-signal what a Good Trans Ally they are.

Again, there are too many examples to post here, so here are just a few examples:

(x)(x)(x)

TERF BLACKLISTS

Transactivists on Tumblr often make lists of alleged “TERFs” and command
their followers not to engage with, or reblog anything from, people on
the lists. Some examples:

image

The “TERF hive” commands trans allies to censor, harass, report, block and otherwise shut down trans-critical sites:

image

DIE CIS SCUM
This is a popular slogan in transactivists circles. Transactivists argue
that their use of this slogan is okay because “they’re more oppressed
than cis people.” As you can see in the picture below, it’s a very
threatening slogan, especially when tattooed on the body of a male
holding a baseball bat.

image

#KILLALLTERFS

A favorite hashtag of transactivists. Many examples of these open threats of violence can be found on the following websites:

TERF is a SlurViolent Receipts | Violent Trans Male Witness

Here is a small sampling of the kinds of threats made against us by transactivists, taken from the 3 links above ^

VIDEOS:

TRANSACTIVISTS IN ACTION
See it for yourself.

Anti-feminist protesters at the Vancouver Women’s Library Launch from GFC on Vimeo.

Also worth considering:

These major “feminist”/women’s websites will publish pro-transgender pieces but won’t publish “transphobic” (trans-critical, gender-critical or radical feminist) pieces:

Feministing, EverydayFeminism, Jezebel, xoJane, The Frisky, Bitch Media,
The Establishment, Refinery29, Bustle, Black Girl Dangerous…

Autostraddle even blatantly admits to being inclined to give trans*people more money for their writing (source)

Many trans-critical writers have had to resort to publishing on Right-wing websites just to have a platform, even though they do not sympathize, or want to associate, with the Right. (This is part of where the “radfems are conservative” stereotype comes from.)

So now the question is:

WHO’S SILENCING WHO?

Ask yourselves: is my emotional labor being reciprocated? Am I being abused? Am I being silenced, coerced, taken advantage of by trans identified males? Would any of the transgender activists that I’ve fought for do the same for me?

Censored by Trans Politics: A Masterpost

Trans Activism and Ur-Fascism

regina-georg:

So, you know how trans activists are constantly insisting that so-called “terfs” are Nazis or fascists?  Well I’m in a trolling mood, so just for fun, lets compare the contemporary trans movement to Umberto Eco’s fourteen-point definition of fascism.  How many characteristics of fascism does trans activism share?

  • “The Cult of Tradition" characterized by cultural syncretism,
    even at the risk of internal contradiction. When all truth has already
    been revealed by Tradition, no new learning can occur, only further
    interpretation and refinement.
    This point is debatable I guess, depending on your definition of “tradition.” The contemporary trans movement certainly relies on a rigid dogma from which “no new learning can occur,” but it’s not necessarily tied to nostalgia and it’s certainly not a form of nationalism.
  • “The Rejection of Modernism”
    which views the rationalistic development of Western culture since the
    Enlightenment as a descent into depravity. Eco distinguishes this from a
    rejection of superficial technological advancement, as many fascist
    regimes cite their industrial potency as proof of the vitality of their
    system.
    Like other post-modernist movements the contemporary trans movement absolutely rejects modernism and reason while embracing and even glorifying new technologies that serve its purposes.  This one is pretty open and shut.

  • “The Cult of Action for Action’s Sake” which dictates that action
    is of value in itself, and should be taken without intellectual
    reflection. This, says Eco, is connected with anti-intellectualism and irrationalism, and often manifests in attacks on modern culture and science.
    The same as the previous point. Contemporary trans activism is based in post-modern queer theory, which rejects science and reason as tools of oppression. Contemporary trans activism promotes an ethos of “action for action’s sake,” by celebrating violence, disruptive spectacle, and constant struggle, and by discouraging critical thinking and introspection.

  • “Disagreement Is Treason” Fascism devalues intellectual discourse
    and critical reasoning as barriers to action, as well as out of fear
    that such analysis will expose the contradictions embodied in a
    syncretistic faith.
    Contemporary trans activists circulate “terf” block lists and try to suppress “terf” rhetoric because they know that their ideology is internally contradictory, and they fear that it will collapse under critical scrutiny.
  • “Fear of Difference” which fascism seeks to exploit and exacerbate,
    often in the form of racism or an appeal against foreigners and
    immigrants.
    Despite the racism of some trans activists, contemporary trans activism does not rely on racism or xenophobia, so this point doesn’t really match up.  However, contemporary trans activism absolutely relies on the demonization of marginalized out-groups, especially lesbians.

  • “Appeal to a Frustrated Middle Class” fearing economic pressure from the demands and aspirations of lower social groups. Contemporary trans activism does not rely on an economic appeal.  However, I don’t think it’s a coincidence that alienated, downwardly-mobile, middle class white males are its primary constituents.

  • “Obsession with a Plot” and the hyping-up of an enemy threat. This often combines an appeal to xenophobia
    with a fear of disloyalty and sabotage from marginalized groups living
    within the society.
    This point is pretty obvious.  Contemporary trans activism is obsessed with a non-existent “terf” conspiracy.  The movement also promotes an extremely paranoid worldview, teaching its followers that everyone is out to get them and encouraging an unhealthy hyper-vigilance about trivial things like “misgendering.”

  • Fascist societies rhetorically cast their enemies as “at the same
    time too strong and too weak.” On the one hand, fascists play up the
    power of certain disfavored elites to encourage in their followers a
    sense of grievance and humiliation. On the other hand, fascist leaders
    point to the decadence of those elites as proof of their ultimate
    feebleness in the face of an overwhelming popular will. 
    See the “terf” conspiracy.  Contemporary trans activism promotes the idea that its followers are under constant existential threat from powerful and dangerous “terfs,” while simultaneously crowing about how ugly, uncool, unpopular and politically marginalized “terfs” supposedly are.

  • “Pacifism is Trafficking with the Enemy” because “Life is Permanent Warfare”
    – there must always be an enemy to fight.
    This is evidenced by the fact that contemporary trans activism can never be satisfied and must constantly move the goalposts to maintain a state of permanent struggle.  No matter how much trans activists claim to want to eliminate “terfs,” they need “terfs” to oppose them in order to justify their movement’s existence.  If every single woman on earth acquiesced to all of their demands, they would still never be satisfied.  No level of submission will ever be enough to make peace with them, because they don’t actually want peace.

  • “Contempt for the Weak” which is uncomfortably married to a chauvinistic popular elitism,
    in which every member of society is superior to outsiders by virtue of
    belonging to the in-group. 
    Contemporary trans activism resembles a cult, in this respect.  Followers are encouraged to believe that their edgy haircuts and obscure micro-identities make them morally superior to the unenlightened “cis” masses. 

  • “Everybody is Educated to Become a Hero” which leads to the embrace of a cult of death.
    As Eco observes, “the Ur-Fascist hero is impatient to die. In his
    impatience, he more frequently sends other people to death.”
    The contemporary trans movement aggressively promotes and glamorizes mental illness, self-harm, and suicide as markers of authenticity and righteous victimhood.  In turn, trans activists’ fixation on their own supposed victimhood is used to justify their victimization of others. 

  • “Machismo” which sublimates the difficult work of permanent war and
    heroism into the sexual sphere. Fascists thus hold “both disdain for
    women and intolerance and condemnation of nonstandard sexual habits,
    from chastity to homosexuality." 
    The contemporary trans movement is intensely misogynistic and homophobic.  Among the straight male leaders of the movement, it’s easy to see a kind of machismo in drag.  Despite the superficial trappings of femininity such as makeup and clothing, most male trans activists exhibit stereotypical masculine behaviors, including aggression, sadism, narcissism, sexual entitlement, emotional fragility, and contempt for weakness.

  • "Selective Populism” – The People, conceived monolithically, have a
    Common Will, distinct from and superior to the viewpoint of any
    individual. As no mass of people can ever be truly unanimous, the Leader
    holds himself out as the interpreter of the popular will (though truly
    he dictates it). Fascists use this concept to delegitimize democratic
    institutions they accuse of “no longer represent[ing] the Voice of the
    People.”
    While the contemporary trans movement lacks a single Leader who can speak for everyone in it, it does have a small vanguard that dictates its Common Will.  The contemporary trans movement conceives of its constituents as a monolith who all share the same interests and dogmatic opinions.  Any trans-identified person who rejects this dogma is smeared as an enemy and often said to be “not really trans.”

  • “Newspeak” – Fascism employs and promotes an impoverished vocabulary in order to limit critical reasoning.  This point speaks for itself.  One of the most obvious features of contemporary trans activism is its heavy use of obnoxious jargon and its aggressive sloganeering and cult-like repetition of thought-terminating clichés.

Trans Activism and Ur-Fascism

regina-georg:

So, you know how trans activists are constantly insisting that so-called “terfs” are Nazis or fascists?  Well I’m in a trolling mood, so just for fun, lets compare the contemporary trans movement to Umberto Eco’s fourteen-point definition of fascism.  How many characteristics of fascism does trans activism share?

  • “The Cult of Tradition" characterized by cultural syncretism,
    even at the risk of internal contradiction. When all truth has already
    been revealed by Tradition, no new learning can occur, only further
    interpretation and refinement.
    This point is debatable I guess, depending on your definition of “tradition.” The contemporary trans movement certainly relies on a rigid dogma from which “no new learning can occur,” but it’s not necessarily tied to nostalgia and it’s certainly not a form of nationalism.
  • “The Rejection of Modernism”
    which views the rationalistic development of Western culture since the
    Enlightenment as a descent into depravity. Eco distinguishes this from a
    rejection of superficial technological advancement, as many fascist
    regimes cite their industrial potency as proof of the vitality of their
    system.
    Like other post-modernist movements the contemporary trans movement absolutely rejects modernism and reason while embracing and even glorifying new technologies that serve its purposes.  This one is pretty open and shut.

  • “The Cult of Action for Action’s Sake” which dictates that action
    is of value in itself, and should be taken without intellectual
    reflection. This, says Eco, is connected with anti-intellectualism and irrationalism, and often manifests in attacks on modern culture and science.
    The same as the previous point. Contemporary trans activism is based in post-modern queer theory, which rejects science and reason as tools of oppression. Contemporary trans activism promotes an ethos of “action for action’s sake,” by celebrating violence, disruptive spectacle, and constant struggle, and by discouraging critical thinking and introspection.

  • “Disagreement Is Treason” Fascism devalues intellectual discourse
    and critical reasoning as barriers to action, as well as out of fear
    that such analysis will expose the contradictions embodied in a
    syncretistic faith.
    Contemporary trans activists circulate “terf” block lists and try to suppress “terf” rhetoric because they know that their ideology is internally contradictory, and they fear that it will collapse under critical scrutiny.
  • “Fear of Difference” which fascism seeks to exploit and exacerbate,
    often in the form of racism or an appeal against foreigners and
    immigrants.
    Despite the racism of some trans activists, contemporary trans activism does not rely on racism or xenophobia, so this point doesn’t really match up.  However, contemporary trans activism absolutely relies on the demonization of marginalized out-groups, especially lesbians.

  • “Appeal to a Frustrated Middle Class” fearing economic pressure from the demands and aspirations of lower social groups. Contemporary trans activism does not rely on an economic appeal.  However, I don’t think it’s a coincidence that alienated, downwardly-mobile, middle class white males are its primary constituents.

  • “Obsession with a Plot” and the hyping-up of an enemy threat. This often combines an appeal to xenophobia
    with a fear of disloyalty and sabotage from marginalized groups living
    within the society.
    This point is pretty obvious.  Contemporary trans activism is obsessed with a non-existent “terf” conspiracy.  The movement also promotes an extremely paranoid worldview, teaching its followers that everyone is out to get them and encouraging an unhealthy hyper-vigilance about trivial things like “misgendering.”

  • Fascist societies rhetorically cast their enemies as “at the same
    time too strong and too weak.” On the one hand, fascists play up the
    power of certain disfavored elites to encourage in their followers a
    sense of grievance and humiliation. On the other hand, fascist leaders
    point to the decadence of those elites as proof of their ultimate
    feebleness in the face of an overwhelming popular will. 
    See the “terf” conspiracy.  Contemporary trans activism promotes the idea that its followers are under constant existential threat from powerful and dangerous “terfs,” while simultaneously crowing about how ugly, uncool, unpopular and politically marginalized “terfs” supposedly are.

  • “Pacifism is Trafficking with the Enemy” because “Life is Permanent Warfare”
    – there must always be an enemy to fight.
    This is evidenced by the fact that contemporary trans activism can never be satisfied and must constantly move the goalposts to maintain a state of permanent struggle.  No matter how much trans activists claim to want to eliminate “terfs,” they need “terfs” to oppose them in order to justify their movement’s existence.  If every single woman on earth acquiesced to all of their demands, they would still never be satisfied.  No level of submission will ever be enough to make peace with them, because they don’t actually want peace.

  • “Contempt for the Weak” which is uncomfortably married to a chauvinistic popular elitism,
    in which every member of society is superior to outsiders by virtue of
    belonging to the in-group. 
    Contemporary trans activism resembles a cult, in this respect.  Followers are encouraged to believe that their edgy haircuts and obscure micro-identities make them morally superior to the unenlightened “cis” masses. 

  • “Everybody is Educated to Become a Hero” which leads to the embrace of a cult of death.
    As Eco observes, “the Ur-Fascist hero is impatient to die. In his
    impatience, he more frequently sends other people to death.”
    The contemporary trans movement aggressively promotes and glamorizes mental illness, self-harm, and suicide as markers of authenticity and righteous victimhood.  In turn, trans activists’ fixation on their own supposed victimhood is used to justify their victimization of others. 

  • “Machismo” which sublimates the difficult work of permanent war and
    heroism into the sexual sphere. Fascists thus hold “both disdain for
    women and intolerance and condemnation of nonstandard sexual habits,
    from chastity to homosexuality." 
    The contemporary trans movement is intensely misogynistic and homophobic.  Among the straight male leaders of the movement, it’s easy to see a kind of machismo in drag.  Despite the superficial trappings of femininity such as makeup and clothing, most male trans activists exhibit stereotypical masculine behaviors, including aggression, sadism, narcissism, sexual entitlement, emotional fragility, and contempt for weakness.

  • "Selective Populism” – The People, conceived monolithically, have a
    Common Will, distinct from and superior to the viewpoint of any
    individual. As no mass of people can ever be truly unanimous, the Leader
    holds himself out as the interpreter of the popular will (though truly
    he dictates it). Fascists use this concept to delegitimize democratic
    institutions they accuse of “no longer represent[ing] the Voice of the
    People.”
    While the contemporary trans movement lacks a single Leader who can speak for everyone in it, it does have a small vanguard that dictates its Common Will.  The contemporary trans movement conceives of its constituents as a monolith who all share the same interests and dogmatic opinions.  Any trans-identified person who rejects this dogma is smeared as an enemy and often said to be “not really trans.”

  • “Newspeak” – Fascism employs and promotes an impoverished vocabulary in order to limit critical reasoning.  This point speaks for itself.  One of the most obvious features of contemporary trans activism is its heavy use of obnoxious jargon and its aggressive sloganeering and cult-like repetition of thought-terminating clichés.

Transactivism is misogyny? You agree with that?

radmercy:

legendofky-theradical:

It’s misogynistic because it is actively working against women’s rights.

Biological women are trapped by societal
expectations and the gender binary system. Women are told that they must
conform to the stereotypical beauty ideals enforced upon us through the media
and our culture. Biological sex is a material reality and gender is a social
construct designed by the patriarchy to be a hierarchal structure in which
masculine qualities are exalted and feminine qualities are punished. In the
mainstream liberal feminism we see today, women are being reduced to
performative femininity and this term of “gender identity” is inherently
harmful to the women’s rights movement. It is hard to assert our identity as a
woman when people do not define a woman as an adult human female, but rather
someone who is presenting as feminine; how can we say we are challenging
stereotypes when we are allowing others at the same time to dictate what is and
what is not a woman based on these very same stereotypes we seek to destroy?
What do you call gender-nonconforming women and butch lesbians? Gender identity
politics reinforces the patriarchal idea that gender is innate, not socially
constructed, and when we do not accept the process of “gender acquisition” by
not practicing the performative and appropriate aspects of gender, we are met
with unpleasant consequences (Shaw & Lee, p. 119). Boys who are growing up
more effeminate or are interested in activities that are coded for girls, they
are ridiculed and called sissies by their peers or even their families; tomboys
are being told they won’t be good mothers or wives and they are also being
labeled as a lesbian in a demeaning way because they do not fit into the neat
box of femininity. When the women who were tomboys growing up come out as
actual lesbians, the social ostracization could be worse especially if they
still do not conform to the strict gender roles expected of them.

Gender is ranked, and according to Judith
Lorber (1994), it was created as a structure and a stratification system to
oppress women, and the differences between males and females were coded based
on what men deemed as masculine and feminine qualities. Lorber acknowledges
that gender ranks men above women, and everything that a man does will always
be valued more over than what a woman does. Other cultures recognize more than
two genders (Shaw & Lee, p. 120), but that does not necessarily mean that
they are more progressive since each gender identity comes with its own
limitations and privileges because it still exists within the hierarchal
structure of gender and those identities will always be ranked lower than men
but higher than women. Rather than creating several different narrow boxes that
define gender, would it not make more sense to scrap the entire gender binary
system instead? Liberal feminism seeks to uphold these stereotypes whereas
radical feminism works towards a world where once you are born, you are
assigned a sex and that is it; you may choose any mode of behavior, dress,
mannerisms and any role in your community that would like. Women need to
celebrate themselves and each other for exactly as they are without trying to
police one another for not conforming to gender roles and expectations. We
cannot allow our biological realities and oppressions to be erased by gender
identity politics, because there are so many women out there in third-world
countries who do no have the option to “identify” out of being a woman;
therefore, they are subjected to sex-based oppressions such as honor killings,
female genital mutilations, and female-selective abortions. Women need to recognize
that change starts within ourselves first, and how we relate to one another. If
we keep pushing the same ideals and stereotypes that were created and defined
by men, then we will not see any progress in the female liberation from
sex-based oppression.

Feminism is the female liberation from the
patriarchy through a social and political movement. The goals of feminism
include eliminating the poverty of women, providing access to education and
reproductive rights, addressing all forms of violence against women, and
promoting women’s participation in the public sphere and their autonomy (Shaw
& Lee, p. 15). There are different forms of feminist thought that provide
distinct explanations for creating social change and understanding the social
organization of gender; the two main separations of feminist thought are
radical and liberal feminism that embody the same overarching goal of equality
for women but differ in how they want to achieve that change. Radical feminism
wants to abolish the current system and start anew while liberal feminists
believe in working within the system because it is still salvageable (p. 15).
Radical feminists believe that liberal feminists are more
conservative in their ideas towards reformation because preserving the system
that was created out of the patriarchy is not enough to resolve the social and
political oppression of women (p. 15). The patriarchy influences everything
from our social institutions (the media and the government) as well as how we
perceive ourselves as women in society, how we relate to one another, and how
men as a social class treat women (p. 15). The biggest issues that libfems and
radfems disagree on are gender identity politics and gender as a social system.

Gender identity politics (specifically transgender activism) has undermined the
entire women’s movement as well as divided the LGB community and is actively destroying
the progress that both women and LGB rights activists have worked hard to
defend against misogyny and homophobia. To start, I mentioned above that the
definition of woman has been twisted into this very narrow and strict concept
based in the performance of femininity. A woman should be defined as an adult
human female in the same way that a doe is an adult female deer with the
opportunity to express herself in whatever way she wishes, whether it is gender
conforming or not. It is perfectly okay for transwomen to create their own
space within the LGB community (they have their own oppressions and socialization issues), but it is not okay to invade female-only spaces
that were created to discuss issues in a safe space unique to biological women pertaining to female
socialization and reproductive rights, as well as to escape male violence.
Transwomen have never, and will never,
understand what it’s like to be socialized as a female (expected to
conform to femininity or bend over backwards to please men) or our
reproductive issues. It’s not meant to be exclusionary, it’s how life,
and biology, is. They tell
us our talk of reproductive rights and issues are too exclusionary, and
demand that their oppressions are worse. They use their identity to
gain access
to our spaces, and then they abuse that access by assaulting
and harassing other women.
They cry that TERFS are killing transwomen each day with our
ideologies………IDEOLOGIES when in fact, its really males killing
transwomen, not TERFS.

This also plays a role in how the LGB community has evolved over time, and
lesbian radical feminists are calling for the action of “dropping the T” (and
also “fuck your alphabet soup”  in
reference to the QIA+)  in the LGBT
community; they believe that the common denominator in the LGB community is the
same-sex attraction and that they are supportive of only the homosexual
transsexuals who experience attraction to members of the same biological sex. Radfems
acknowledge that transgender people transition for a variety of reasons
including mental illness and sexual dysphoria, but it is unfortunate that
medical transition and surgery are being offered as the first line of treatment
rather than addressing these issues from a psychological perspective and
focusing on the underlying causes of unhappiness and discomfort. In the last
decade or so, many heterosexuals (typically white males) have invaded the LGB
community with their several different gender identities and cried that their
oppressions are worse than those who experience actual homophobia within the
public sphere. Transwomen demand to redefine lesbian sexuality by insisting
that lesbians must cater to their gender identity and sleep with them despite
lesbians experiencing same-sex attraction, and transwomen also call anyone who
disagrees with them a “TERF” or
transphobic., and advocating for violence against us.The whole common denominator of the LGBT
community has been the same-sex attraction and that’s it, but now it has
been infiltrated by straight people with made up identities
(its called
having a personality) who try to insert themselves into our community,
claim they are more oppressed and then demonize us for having same-sex
attraction, calling us “genital fetishists”. It’s the same sort of
conversion therapy and rape tactics that have been used on us for
decades, saying if we just “tried penis/vagina once” and only accepting
us when we say we have prior traumas, it’s homophobic and the new
progressive language. It’s telling young gender nonconforming (and most
likely gay) children that they have to transition in order to be
socially accepted when they are perfect the way they are.
Don’t even get me started on transactivists erasing lesbian and gay history by claiming Stonewall and our community was started by “trans women of color” when Stonewall was actually started by a lesbian of color, Storme Delarverie.

I have many
trans friends, people who identify as nb, and I respect and use their
pronouns, support their transitions, but I do not support the straight
males who try to pretend they know what it’s like to be a woman
. Transwomen believe that they can put on makeup and a dress, and that because
they call themselves a woman (or declare that womanhood is a feeling), that
they are a woman; again, this is reducing women to performative femininity,
upholding these stereotypes rather than challenging them, and also dismissing
sex-based oppression. Cisgender privilege is defined as “those whose gender
identity, role, or expression is considered to match their assigned gender by
societal standards” by Evin Taylor (2010). Libfems believe that women and girls
do not experience dysphoria with their bodies and therefore they have privilege
over transwomen. This is a ridiculous concept in radical feminism because it
denies the lived experiences of biological women and how we are forced to
prescribe to femininity and this created social role of being a woman. Women
who do not conform to beauty ideals and societal standards are rejected and
treated just as harshly by the rest of society; women who do not wear makeup or
present femininely in the workplace are considered unprofessional, women in
developing countries are exiled to menstruation huts, and young girls are
subjected to female-selective abortions, genital mutilations and child brides
simply because they are biologically female. Transgender women experience different
oppressions and discomfort with their bodies as a marginalized class, but as
biological males they are not treated worse than females who are not
transgender.

In
short, transactivism and gender identity politics are detrimental to the
women’s rights movement. The postmodernist deconstruction of the word woman
removes power from biological women in their ability to define themselves and
their social, political, and economic oppressions. Radical feminism has never
left, nor has it evolved into the mainstream liberal feminism today which is a
common misconception. It would be in our society’s best interest to critically
analyze the gender binary system in the same way radical feminists do in order
to bring power back to biological women and address sex-based oppressions
created out of the patriarchy.
Radical feminism helped me take back my
identity as a woman
, and as a lesbian, and it’s not as demonized as
tumblr makes it out to be. I’m not transphobic, I’m not a bigot, I just
want to exist as a woman the best I can in this woman-hating culture.
Sure, there are a few bad radfem apples but there are horrible people
within every group, so don’t let a few define an entire movement.
Radical feminists are here for females only.

My girl went IN

Transactivism is misogyny? You agree with that?

radmercy:

legendofky-theradical:

It’s misogynistic because it is actively working against women’s rights.

Biological women are trapped by societal
expectations and the gender binary system. Women are told that they must
conform to the stereotypical beauty ideals enforced upon us through the media
and our culture. Biological sex is a material reality and gender is a social
construct designed by the patriarchy to be a hierarchal structure in which
masculine qualities are exalted and feminine qualities are punished. In the
mainstream liberal feminism we see today, women are being reduced to
performative femininity and this term of “gender identity” is inherently
harmful to the women’s rights movement. It is hard to assert our identity as a
woman when people do not define a woman as an adult human female, but rather
someone who is presenting as feminine; how can we say we are challenging
stereotypes when we are allowing others at the same time to dictate what is and
what is not a woman based on these very same stereotypes we seek to destroy?
What do you call gender-nonconforming women and butch lesbians? Gender identity
politics reinforces the patriarchal idea that gender is innate, not socially
constructed, and when we do not accept the process of “gender acquisition” by
not practicing the performative and appropriate aspects of gender, we are met
with unpleasant consequences (Shaw & Lee, p. 119). Boys who are growing up
more effeminate or are interested in activities that are coded for girls, they
are ridiculed and called sissies by their peers or even their families; tomboys
are being told they won’t be good mothers or wives and they are also being
labeled as a lesbian in a demeaning way because they do not fit into the neat
box of femininity. When the women who were tomboys growing up come out as
actual lesbians, the social ostracization could be worse especially if they
still do not conform to the strict gender roles expected of them.

Gender is ranked, and according to Judith
Lorber (1994), it was created as a structure and a stratification system to
oppress women, and the differences between males and females were coded based
on what men deemed as masculine and feminine qualities. Lorber acknowledges
that gender ranks men above women, and everything that a man does will always
be valued more over than what a woman does. Other cultures recognize more than
two genders (Shaw & Lee, p. 120), but that does not necessarily mean that
they are more progressive since each gender identity comes with its own
limitations and privileges because it still exists within the hierarchal
structure of gender and those identities will always be ranked lower than men
but higher than women. Rather than creating several different narrow boxes that
define gender, would it not make more sense to scrap the entire gender binary
system instead? Liberal feminism seeks to uphold these stereotypes whereas
radical feminism works towards a world where once you are born, you are
assigned a sex and that is it; you may choose any mode of behavior, dress,
mannerisms and any role in your community that would like. Women need to
celebrate themselves and each other for exactly as they are without trying to
police one another for not conforming to gender roles and expectations. We
cannot allow our biological realities and oppressions to be erased by gender
identity politics, because there are so many women out there in third-world
countries who do no have the option to “identify” out of being a woman;
therefore, they are subjected to sex-based oppressions such as honor killings,
female genital mutilations, and female-selective abortions. Women need to recognize
that change starts within ourselves first, and how we relate to one another. If
we keep pushing the same ideals and stereotypes that were created and defined
by men, then we will not see any progress in the female liberation from
sex-based oppression.

Feminism is the female liberation from the
patriarchy through a social and political movement. The goals of feminism
include eliminating the poverty of women, providing access to education and
reproductive rights, addressing all forms of violence against women, and
promoting women’s participation in the public sphere and their autonomy (Shaw
& Lee, p. 15). There are different forms of feminist thought that provide
distinct explanations for creating social change and understanding the social
organization of gender; the two main separations of feminist thought are
radical and liberal feminism that embody the same overarching goal of equality
for women but differ in how they want to achieve that change. Radical feminism
wants to abolish the current system and start anew while liberal feminists
believe in working within the system because it is still salvageable (p. 15).
Radical feminists believe that liberal feminists are more
conservative in their ideas towards reformation because preserving the system
that was created out of the patriarchy is not enough to resolve the social and
political oppression of women (p. 15). The patriarchy influences everything
from our social institutions (the media and the government) as well as how we
perceive ourselves as women in society, how we relate to one another, and how
men as a social class treat women (p. 15). The biggest issues that libfems and
radfems disagree on are gender identity politics and gender as a social system.

Gender identity politics (specifically transgender activism) has undermined the
entire women’s movement as well as divided the LGB community and is actively destroying
the progress that both women and LGB rights activists have worked hard to
defend against misogyny and homophobia. To start, I mentioned above that the
definition of woman has been twisted into this very narrow and strict concept
based in the performance of femininity. A woman should be defined as an adult
human female in the same way that a doe is an adult female deer with the
opportunity to express herself in whatever way she wishes, whether it is gender
conforming or not. It is perfectly okay for transwomen to create their own
space within the LGB community (they have their own oppressions and socialization issues), but it is not okay to invade female-only spaces
that were created to discuss issues in a safe space unique to biological women pertaining to female
socialization and reproductive rights, as well as to escape male violence.
Transwomen have never, and will never,
understand what it’s like to be socialized as a female (expected to
conform to femininity or bend over backwards to please men) or our
reproductive issues. It’s not meant to be exclusionary, it’s how life,
and biology, is. They tell
us our talk of reproductive rights and issues are too exclusionary, and
demand that their oppressions are worse. They use their identity to
gain access
to our spaces, and then they abuse that access by assaulting
and harassing other women.
They cry that TERFS are killing transwomen each day with our
ideologies………IDEOLOGIES when in fact, its really males killing
transwomen, not TERFS.

This also plays a role in how the LGB community has evolved over time, and
lesbian radical feminists are calling for the action of “dropping the T” (and
also “fuck your alphabet soup”  in
reference to the QIA+)  in the LGBT
community; they believe that the common denominator in the LGB community is the
same-sex attraction and that they are supportive of only the homosexual
transsexuals who experience attraction to members of the same biological sex. Radfems
acknowledge that transgender people transition for a variety of reasons
including mental illness and sexual dysphoria, but it is unfortunate that
medical transition and surgery are being offered as the first line of treatment
rather than addressing these issues from a psychological perspective and
focusing on the underlying causes of unhappiness and discomfort. In the last
decade or so, many heterosexuals (typically white males) have invaded the LGB
community with their several different gender identities and cried that their
oppressions are worse than those who experience actual homophobia within the
public sphere. Transwomen demand to redefine lesbian sexuality by insisting
that lesbians must cater to their gender identity and sleep with them despite
lesbians experiencing same-sex attraction, and transwomen also call anyone who
disagrees with them a “TERF” or
transphobic., and advocating for violence against us.The whole common denominator of the LGBT
community has been the same-sex attraction and that’s it, but now it has
been infiltrated by straight people with made up identities
(its called
having a personality) who try to insert themselves into our community,
claim they are more oppressed and then demonize us for having same-sex
attraction, calling us “genital fetishists”. It’s the same sort of
conversion therapy and rape tactics that have been used on us for
decades, saying if we just “tried penis/vagina once” and only accepting
us when we say we have prior traumas, it’s homophobic and the new
progressive language. It’s telling young gender nonconforming (and most
likely gay) children that they have to transition in order to be
socially accepted when they are perfect the way they are.
Don’t even get me started on transactivists erasing lesbian and gay history by claiming Stonewall and our community was started by “trans women of color” when Stonewall was actually started by a lesbian of color, Storme Delarverie.

I have many
trans friends, people who identify as nb, and I respect and use their
pronouns, support their transitions, but I do not support the straight
males who try to pretend they know what it’s like to be a woman
. Transwomen believe that they can put on makeup and a dress, and that because
they call themselves a woman (or declare that womanhood is a feeling), that
they are a woman; again, this is reducing women to performative femininity,
upholding these stereotypes rather than challenging them, and also dismissing
sex-based oppression. Cisgender privilege is defined as “those whose gender
identity, role, or expression is considered to match their assigned gender by
societal standards” by Evin Taylor (2010). Libfems believe that women and girls
do not experience dysphoria with their bodies and therefore they have privilege
over transwomen. This is a ridiculous concept in radical feminism because it
denies the lived experiences of biological women and how we are forced to
prescribe to femininity and this created social role of being a woman. Women
who do not conform to beauty ideals and societal standards are rejected and
treated just as harshly by the rest of society; women who do not wear makeup or
present femininely in the workplace are considered unprofessional, women in
developing countries are exiled to menstruation huts, and young girls are
subjected to female-selective abortions, genital mutilations and child brides
simply because they are biologically female. Transgender women experience different
oppressions and discomfort with their bodies as a marginalized class, but as
biological males they are not treated worse than females who are not
transgender.

In
short, transactivism and gender identity politics are detrimental to the
women’s rights movement. The postmodernist deconstruction of the word woman
removes power from biological women in their ability to define themselves and
their social, political, and economic oppressions. Radical feminism has never
left, nor has it evolved into the mainstream liberal feminism today which is a
common misconception. It would be in our society’s best interest to critically
analyze the gender binary system in the same way radical feminists do in order
to bring power back to biological women and address sex-based oppressions
created out of the patriarchy.
Radical feminism helped me take back my
identity as a woman
, and as a lesbian, and it’s not as demonized as
tumblr makes it out to be. I’m not transphobic, I’m not a bigot, I just
want to exist as a woman the best I can in this woman-hating culture.
Sure, there are a few bad radfem apples but there are horrible people
within every group, so don’t let a few define an entire movement.
Radical feminists are here for females only.

My girl went IN