“Cis lesbians who won’t date trans women? They’re just like white people who won’t date black people. It’s a prejudice. Plus, trans women can get bottom and top surgery so cis lesbians (terfs) have no excuse.”

Lets stick with your analogy a bit. You say that women who don’t want to sleep with ‘people with penises’ are the same as white people who do not want to sleep with black people.

Then you assert that trans women can get bottom surgery, essentially making them indistinguishable from biologically female people.

So by that logic, if a black person bleached their skin, dyed and straightened their hair, and abandoned all cultural markers, they would be functionally white, right? By that logic, the person who did not want to date black people would have no grounds to refuse that person because, according to you, they would no longer be black.

Sound stupid? It is. If you don’t agree that black people can become white through surgery and cosmetic treatment, stop using race as an equivalent to transgenderism.

libfems: we include trans women because we both conform to the same gender stereotypes. we exclude trans men because they don’t conform to feminine gender stereotypes. we define womanhood by conforming to patriarchal gender stereotypes. feminism exists to protect your right to conform to patriarchy.
radfems: we include trans men because they suffer from the same sex based oppression as all other females do. we don’t include trans women because they don’t suffer the sex based oppression that females do. we define womanhood based on biology alone because we believe women should not be defined by patriarchal gender roles. feminism exists to free women from the chains of patriarchal gender.

holy shit larps, did you hear about pakistan allowing transgenders to change their gender legally and also the senate passing the trans protection rights pill?? like not that im against the second part, but WHAT THE FUCK, thats a country where being gay is punished by beatings and prison time and honor killings against gays are normalized and women cant even go out alone and meanwhile the lawmakers worship troons. LMAO classic

nabokovsshadows:

schoolgirlcrush:

:

transgenderism is an inherently conservative ideology

Additionally; according to Pew Research Center, 13% of pakistani people believe that homosexuals should be tolerated. Meanwhile, 51% of pakistani people believe that transgender individuals should be accepted and protected from workplace discrimination. 💅 Pakistan also allows trans people to choose a third gender on their legal documents, meanwhile the same politicans have said that homosexuals should all be killed.

This is also worth looking at:

Interesting how the only LGBT rights being protected are transgender ones 💅 Even the anti-discrimination laws only apply if the victim is trans.

Also from wikipedia:

“Political parties, interest groups and other political organizations in Pakistan are required to respect Islam and “public morality”, which may preclude any endorsement of LGBT rights. The one exception seems to be Pakistani citizens who are transgender or a member of the third gender. In 2009, the Pakistani Supreme Court ruled that the Government must take proactive steps to protect transgenders from harassment and discrimination.“

Anyway, when will people finally realize that the only reason some transgenders are discriminated against is because people assume they’re gay?! When you’re not same-sex attracted, they have much less of a problem with you. And even when you’re same-sex attracted, you deciding to transition is seen as an attempt to become heterosexual so obviously that is rewarded by conservative homophobes.

They see transgenderism as the ‘cure’ for homosexuality.

aeroposter:

from gendertrender, such a good thread that i wanted it on my tumblr

aeroposter:

from gendertrender, such a good thread that i wanted it on my tumblr

celtyradfem:

If suffragettess let trans males into the suffrage movement we wouldn’t have gotten the vote

Seriously they would have betrayed us and leaked information to the authorities

@artemisgif to elaborate suffragettes used to secretly go to meetings and rallies without their husband’s knowledge. Suffragettes used to pretend they were going to sewing circles when they were really fighting for their rights in the shadows.

If the suffragettes were gullible enough to let trans males into their movement and let them in on their secrets they would have alerted the authorities (who were often brutal to suffragettes) and probably even worse their husbands (who could get them commuted to a mental asylum if they wanted). This was back when a man legally owned his wife and her property (even her clothes technically belonged to him).

Basically trans males would have been the perfect saboteurs by pretending to be one of of them while having their loyalties with the patriarchy. There is no way the police or anti feminists wouldn’t have tried this strategy to suppress the women’s movement.

If our foremothers let trans males into the women’s movement (if they were around) then we would have to wait much longer for the vote and maybe even blown our chances.

Transgenderism is makes spying on feminists easy and dumbass libfems are letting them in.