iloveradfems:

rejectingfemininity:

celtyradfem:

cocksmasher69:

celtyradfem:

@partyshadow Isn’t reducing women down to gender stereotypes and immeasurable feelings inherently sexist?

Isn’t pretending that women are disconnected from their biology an insult to their intelligence?

Aren’t you tired of asking stupid questions?

@partyshadow are yall ever going to come up with some new bullshit? Is calling a library a “building” reducing it to a bunch of bricks? Or are yall just salty that pointing out that women have vaginas means any creature with a penis isn’t a woman? I think it’s the latter.

This rhetoric is insulting to women

They use it to try and embarrass women for knowing we are female and rejecting gender roles and transgenderism

The “walking vaginas” rhetoric is a sneaky to call women cunts

What does it even mean to “reduce a woman to a vagina”?? I want a formal definition.

This should be used to refer to the straight men who look at women and see a body to fuck, without any relevant humanity or wants and needs. How is that the same as highlighting a defining characteristic of a group??

A woman can have a vagina and still be a full human being, shocking I know

This is the logical conclusion of gender blind ideology. Any differences between the oppressed and the oppressor will be treated with contempt and acknowledging any differences is bigotry but only if you acknowledge the oppressed class’s innate traits. The oppressor’s bodies are not treated as an other. Male is standard. Female is marked.

In order for gender blind ideology to work you need to ‘equalise’ people by erasing anything that makes them different. To be equal you must be the same. Under this worldview femaleness is an abberation that is an affront to their understanding of equality.

The constant degradation of women and our femaleness is not just rhetoric. They really can’t imagine a whole woman without her denying her femaleness because they see women as disconnected body parts.

Acknowledging our anatomy is “reducing to genitalia” (ignoring the other undeniably female body parts we have) is seen as degrading because female anatomy is an insult to them. Being female is degrading to them. If we openly acknowledge we are female trans activists believe we are degrading ourselves. They truly believe women are inferior.

iloveradfems:

rejectingfemininity:

celtyradfem:

cocksmasher69:

celtyradfem:

@partyshadow Isn’t reducing women down to gender stereotypes and immeasurable feelings inherently sexist?

Isn’t pretending that women are disconnected from their biology an insult to their intelligence?

Aren’t you tired of asking stupid questions?

@partyshadow are yall ever going to come up with some new bullshit? Is calling a library a “building” reducing it to a bunch of bricks? Or are yall just salty that pointing out that women have vaginas means any creature with a penis isn’t a woman? I think it’s the latter.

This rhetoric is insulting to women

They use it to try and embarrass women for knowing we are female and rejecting gender roles and transgenderism

The “walking vaginas” rhetoric is a sneaky to call women cunts

What does it even mean to “reduce a woman to a vagina”?? I want a formal definition.

This should be used to refer to the straight men who look at women and see a body to fuck, without any relevant humanity or wants and needs. How is that the same as highlighting a defining characteristic of a group??

A woman can have a vagina and still be a full human being, shocking I know

This is the logical conclusion of gender blind ideology. Any differences between the oppressed and the oppressor will be treated with contempt and acknowledging any differences is bigotry but only if you acknowledge the oppressed class’s innate traits. The oppressor’s bodies are not treated as an other. Male is standard. Female is marked.

In order for gender blind ideology to work you need to ‘equalise’ people by erasing anything that makes them different. To be equal you must be the same. Under this worldview femaleness is an abberation that is an affront to their understanding of equality.

The constant degradation of women and our femaleness is not just rhetoric. They really can’t imagine a whole woman without her denying her femaleness because they see women as disconnected body parts.

Acknowledging our anatomy is “reducing to genitalia” (ignoring the other undeniably female body parts we have) is seen as degrading because female anatomy is an insult to them. Being female is degrading to them. If we openly acknowledge we are female trans activists believe we are degrading ourselves. They truly believe women are inferior.