They changed the replies now it sucks
It won’t show my replies
How do I fix it?
Isn’t reducing women down to their genitalia inherently sexist
@partyshadow Isn’t reducing women down to gender stereotypes and immeasurable feelings inherently sexist?
Isn’t pretending that women are disconnected from their biology an insult to their intelligence?
Aren’t you tired of asking stupid questions?
@partyshadow are yall ever going to come up with some new bullshit? Is calling a library a “building” reducing it to a bunch of bricks? Or are yall just salty that pointing out that women have vaginas means any creature with a penis isn’t a woman? I think it’s the latter.
This rhetoric is insulting to women
They use it to try and embarrass women for knowing we are female and rejecting gender roles and transgenderism
The “walking vaginas” rhetoric is a sneaky to call women cunts
What does it even mean to “reduce a woman to a vagina”?? I want a formal definition.
This should be used to refer to the straight men who look at women and see a body to fuck, without any relevant humanity or wants and needs. How is that the same as highlighting a defining characteristic of a group??
It’s not. They just repeat it like the cult they are because they have no substantial arguments and all they can manage is regurgitating the same three lines over and over again
I love how they’re implying that stating that women have a vagina is reductive
Despite this trans activists claiming trans males have ‘female’ brains isn’t reductive
There was a comic about this
Isn’t reducing women down to their genitalia inherently sexist
@partyshadow Isn’t reducing women down to gender stereotypes and immeasurable feelings inherently sexist?
Isn’t pretending that women are disconnected from their biology an insult to their intelligence?
Aren’t you tired of asking stupid questions?
@partyshadow are yall ever going to come up with some new bullshit? Is calling a library a “building” reducing it to a bunch of bricks? Or are yall just salty that pointing out that women have vaginas means any creature with a penis isn’t a woman? I think it’s the latter.
This rhetoric is insulting to women
They use it to try and embarrass women for knowing we are female and rejecting gender roles and transgenderism
The “walking vaginas” rhetoric is a sneaky to call women cunts
What does it even mean to “reduce a woman to a vagina”?? I want a formal definition.
This should be used to refer to the straight men who look at women and see a body to fuck, without any relevant humanity or wants and needs. How is that the same as highlighting a defining characteristic of a group??
It’s not. They just repeat it like the cult they are because they have no substantial arguments and all they can manage is regurgitating the same three lines over and over again
I love how they’re implying that stating that women have a vagina is reductive
Despite this trans activists claiming trans males have ‘female’ brains isn’t reductive
There was a comic about this
Isn’t reducing women down to their genitalia inherently sexist
@partyshadow Isn’t reducing women down to gender stereotypes and immeasurable feelings inherently sexist?
Isn’t pretending that women are disconnected from their biology an insult to their intelligence?
Aren’t you tired of asking stupid questions?
@partyshadow are yall ever going to come up with some new bullshit? Is calling a library a “building” reducing it to a bunch of bricks? Or are yall just salty that pointing out that women have vaginas means any creature with a penis isn’t a woman? I think it’s the latter.
This rhetoric is insulting to women
They use it to try and embarrass women for knowing we are female and rejecting gender roles and transgenderism
The “walking vaginas” rhetoric is a sneaky to call women cunts
What does it even mean to “reduce a woman to a vagina”?? I want a formal definition.
This should be used to refer to the straight men who look at women and see a body to fuck, without any relevant humanity or wants and needs. How is that the same as highlighting a defining characteristic of a group??
These same fuckheads watch pornography, support prostutution and some of them are even johns.
@partyshadow can you define what “reducing to genitalia” means?
Isn’t reducing women down to their genitalia inherently sexist
@partyshadow Isn’t reducing women down to gender stereotypes and immeasurable feelings inherently sexist?
Isn’t pretending that women are disconnected from their biology an insult to their intelligence?
Aren’t you tired of asking stupid questions?
@partyshadow are yall ever going to come up with some new bullshit? Is calling a library a “building” reducing it to a bunch of bricks? Or are yall just salty that pointing out that women have vaginas means any creature with a penis isn’t a woman? I think it’s the latter.
This rhetoric is insulting to women
They use it to try and embarrass women for knowing we are female and rejecting gender roles and transgenderism
The “walking vaginas” rhetoric is a sneaky to call women cunts
What does it even mean to “reduce a woman to a vagina”?? I want a formal definition.
This should be used to refer to the straight men who look at women and see a body to fuck, without any relevant humanity or wants and needs. How is that the same as highlighting a defining characteristic of a group??
These same fuckheads watch pornography, support prostutution and some of them are even johns.
@partyshadow can you define what “reducing to genitalia” means?
Self proclaimed communists and anarchists who hate ‘terfs’ are hilarious
Communists believe in material reality and sex based oppression. Communism encourages women to organise and usually let congregate without male interference.
Anarachism is supposed to be against hierarchy and rigid rules. This does not work with the trans movement’s word policing and constant interference with others especially women.
Right wing conservatives aren’t this controlling of their women. They let them have their own spaces and organise without demanding to be in their groups.
When you are more sexist than right wing conservatives you should self reflect.
Self proclaimed communists and anarchists who hate ‘terfs’ are hilarious
Communists believe in material reality and sex based oppression. Communism encourages women to organise and usually let congregate without male interference.
Anarachism is supposed to be against hierarchy and rigid rules. This does not work with the trans movement’s word policing and constant interference with others especially women.
Right wing conservatives aren’t this controlling of their women. They let them have their own spaces and organise without demanding to be in their groups.
When you are more sexist than right wing conservatives you should self reflect.
Isn’t reducing women down to their genitalia inherently sexist
@partyshadow Isn’t reducing women down to gender stereotypes and immeasurable feelings inherently sexist?
Isn’t pretending that women are disconnected from their biology an insult to their intelligence?
Aren’t you tired of asking stupid questions?
@partyshadow are yall ever going to come up with some new bullshit? Is calling a library a “building” reducing it to a bunch of bricks? Or are yall just salty that pointing out that women have vaginas means any creature with a penis isn’t a woman? I think it’s the latter.
This rhetoric is insulting to women
They use it to try and embarrass women for knowing we are female and rejecting gender roles and transgenderism
The “walking vaginas” rhetoric is a sneaky to call women cunts
Celtyradfem 